1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1985.tb02082.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What’s New in Pregnancy Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 In the time between a woman's last period and any pregnancy test result, it is impossible to know with certainty whether she is in fact pregnant. Significantly, this time span of 'unknown condition' is almost identical to the period of time recommended for the early use of RU486/PG.…”
Section: Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 In the time between a woman's last period and any pregnancy test result, it is impossible to know with certainty whether she is in fact pregnant. Significantly, this time span of 'unknown condition' is almost identical to the period of time recommended for the early use of RU486/PG.…”
Section: Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prototype design of LFA was first reported in 1956 by Plotz and Singer 6 , which later gained explosive attention from the 1980s when the urine-based pregnancy test became commercially available 7 . Indeed, as a type of disposable paper assay with a user-friendly format, LFA fulfils the framework of ASSURED (affordable, sensitive, specific, user-friendly, robust, equipment-free and deliverable) for POCT evaluation proposed by the World Health Organization 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we developed a rapid diagnosis kit according to the principle of immunochromatography to study cobra bites [21]. The kit used a lateral flow assay (LFA) with an immunochromato-microfluidic paper-based device that has been widely used to detect pregnancy, drugs, bacteria, viruses, and cardiac biomarker as the technique has advanced [22][23][24][25][26][27]. Based on this LFA method, we could differentiate cobra snake bites from other viper bites quickly in the same area [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%