2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What’s in a name? Typicality and relatedness effects in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(78 reference statements)
7
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shared properties between categories can create fuzzy category boundaries, which influence performance for a variety of tasks in children and adults. For example, performance in adults (and results recently found in children) in a category-verification task (e.g., vote "yes" if the item is a bird) is slower and less accurate for out-ofcategory items that share some properties with category items (e.g., bat); this is termed the relatedness effect (Jerger & Damian, 2005;Medin, Ross, & Markman, 2005). Classification performance in children is less consistent, however, and a few children may show either more limited (including typical objects only) or broader (including typical, atypical, and related out-of-category items) category membership (Jerger & Damian, 2005).…”
Section: Relatedness Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Shared properties between categories can create fuzzy category boundaries, which influence performance for a variety of tasks in children and adults. For example, performance in adults (and results recently found in children) in a category-verification task (e.g., vote "yes" if the item is a bird) is slower and less accurate for out-ofcategory items that share some properties with category items (e.g., bat); this is termed the relatedness effect (Jerger & Damian, 2005;Medin, Ross, & Markman, 2005). Classification performance in children is less consistent, however, and a few children may show either more limited (including typical objects only) or broader (including typical, atypical, and related out-of-category items) category membership (Jerger & Damian, 2005).…”
Section: Relatedness Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Jerger and Damian (2005) investigated children's understanding of an artifactual, structurally dissimilar category: clothing. They selected the clothing category for their initial research because it comprises developmentally early words across many cultures (Bloom, 2000).…”
Section: Children's Category-verification Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In conducting child studies in cognitive psychology with categorical materials, it is important to know which exemplars are familiar for them and to identify the dominant exemplars for their age. For instance, studies about category typicality (e.g., Hasselhorn, 1992;Jerger & Damian, 2005), false memories (e.g., Howe, 2006), cued recall (e.g., Cooper & Newman, 1987), and interference in children (e.g., Howe, 2004) have used materials that require the knowledge stemming from category norms specifically derived from children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%