2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12147-016-9166-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What’s in a Name? The Negative Implications of Gender Neutrality in the Intimate Partner Violence Prevention and Intervention Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women and victim-survivors are routinely responsibilized for DVA no more so than when their families come to the attention of children's social care (Featherstone & Fraser, 2012;Humphreys & Absler, 2011;Olszowy et al, 2020). With this, is a persistent focus on mothering (Featherstone & Peckover, 2007;Hester, 2011), preserving a construction of women as primarily responsible for child safeguarding and welfare (Lapierre, 2009), which is bolstered by gendered discourses of parenthood (Sinnott & Artz, 2016). This construction perpetuates a practice pattern in which focus on the victim-survivor is regarded "the only solution" (CQC et al, 2017, p. 5), with far too little intervention directed at the abusing parent and reinforcing a culture of motherblame (Strega et al, 2008).…”
Section: Mothers and The Children's Social Care Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women and victim-survivors are routinely responsibilized for DVA no more so than when their families come to the attention of children's social care (Featherstone & Fraser, 2012;Humphreys & Absler, 2011;Olszowy et al, 2020). With this, is a persistent focus on mothering (Featherstone & Peckover, 2007;Hester, 2011), preserving a construction of women as primarily responsible for child safeguarding and welfare (Lapierre, 2009), which is bolstered by gendered discourses of parenthood (Sinnott & Artz, 2016). This construction perpetuates a practice pattern in which focus on the victim-survivor is regarded "the only solution" (CQC et al, 2017, p. 5), with far too little intervention directed at the abusing parent and reinforcing a culture of motherblame (Strega et al, 2008).…”
Section: Mothers and The Children's Social Care Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parenting surveillance that takes place in social service settings has been noted to disproportionally sanction marginalised mothers [ 24 ], where increased scrutiny and additional “protection” of their children is justified due to them being deemed “threatening” or “unruly” [ 25 ]. Within the construction of women as being primarily responsible for child welfare and safeguarding, reinforced by gendered discourses of parenting [ 26 ], the focus on victims of domestic abuse (i.e., the mother) rather than the perpetrator leads to mothers being viewed as “unprotective” [ 27 ]. The surveillance of victims of domestic abuse is thus justified by blaming them for “failure” to prevent the violence and being unable to protect their children from an abusive home [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%