2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What's eating the internet? Content and perceived harm of pro-eating disorder websites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of particular concern is the widespread existence of online pro-eating disorder (pro-ED) communities that promote and sometimes even encourage disordered eating behaviors (e.g., harmful weight loss or eating control practices) and often shun recovery. Evidence from multiple studies examining pro-ED content online has shown that viewers of pro-ED websites have increased body dissatisfaction, increased eating disturbance, lower self-esteem, poorer ED-related quality of life and perceive themselves as heavier than they are (Bardone-Cone & Cass, 2007; Harper, Sperry, & Thompson, 2008; Juarascio, Shoaib, & Timko, 2010; Peebles et al, 2012; Steakley-Freeman, Jarvis-Creasey, & Wesselmann, 2015). Moreover, systematic content analyses have found that pro-ED websites tend to display “thinspiration” material and explicitly discuss how to engage in ED behaviors, while few websites provide recovery-oriented information (Borzekowski, Schenk, Wilson, & Peebles, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular concern is the widespread existence of online pro-eating disorder (pro-ED) communities that promote and sometimes even encourage disordered eating behaviors (e.g., harmful weight loss or eating control practices) and often shun recovery. Evidence from multiple studies examining pro-ED content online has shown that viewers of pro-ED websites have increased body dissatisfaction, increased eating disturbance, lower self-esteem, poorer ED-related quality of life and perceive themselves as heavier than they are (Bardone-Cone & Cass, 2007; Harper, Sperry, & Thompson, 2008; Juarascio, Shoaib, & Timko, 2010; Peebles et al, 2012; Steakley-Freeman, Jarvis-Creasey, & Wesselmann, 2015). Moreover, systematic content analyses have found that pro-ED websites tend to display “thinspiration” material and explicitly discuss how to engage in ED behaviors, while few websites provide recovery-oriented information (Borzekowski, Schenk, Wilson, & Peebles, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pro-ED content can be found on websites, forums, personal blogs (Borzekowski, Schenk, Wilson, & Peebles, 2010), and in communities on social networks (Juarascio, Shoaib, & Timko, 2010). Common features are motivational or "thinspiration" content, and "thin commandments", that is, instructions and techniques for maintaining an ED and rapid weight loss (Borzekowski et al, 2010;Lapinski, 2006;Norris, Boydell, Pinhas, & Katzman, 2006;Steakley-Freeman, Jarvis-Creasey, & Wesselmann, 2015). Experimentally induced exposure to Pro-ED websites has been found to be associated with increases in dieting, body dissatisfaction, and negative affect (for a review see Rodgers, Lowy, Halperin, & Franko, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A compelling example of this occurs in online communities, such as “Pro-Ana” (Pro-Anorexia) communities. Within these communities, individuals share photos of the impact of dangerous dietary restriction and tips on enhancing harmful weight loss strategies, personal examples which may negatively influence vulnerable individuals who seek to copy these behaviors or emulate these ascribed values [ 5 , 6 ]. Examples of harmful social influence may also extend to treatment contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%