2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10493-009-9297-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What’s “cool” on eriophyoid mites?

Abstract: Fundamental knowledge on the morphology, biology, ecology, and economic importance of Eriophyoidea has been exhaustively compiled by Lindquist et al. (Eriophyoid mites--their biology, natural enemies and control; Elsevier, 1996). Since that time, the number of recognized species and the economic importance of the taxon have increased substantially. The aim of this paper is to analyze and briefly review new findings from eriophyoid mites' literature after Lindquist et al. book, stressing persistent gaps and nee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
(184 reference statements)
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the phylogeny and systematics of the genus Trisetacus as well as the family Phytoptidae, which is regarded as a paraphyletic group based almost entirely on plesiomorphic characters, an integrative approach combining morphological and molecular data should be useful (Lindquist and Amrine 1996; de Lillo and Skoracka 2010; Navajas and Navia 2010). Until now, only a few morphometric analyses have been applied to phylogenetic studies of Eriophyoidea (Hong and Zhang 1996a, b, 1997), and few studies have assessed intraspecific variation in Eriophyoidea, including host-adapted strains or cryptic species (Skoracka et al 2002; Navia et al 2006; Skoracka and Kuczyński 2006; Magud et al 2007; Vidović et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the phylogeny and systematics of the genus Trisetacus as well as the family Phytoptidae, which is regarded as a paraphyletic group based almost entirely on plesiomorphic characters, an integrative approach combining morphological and molecular data should be useful (Lindquist and Amrine 1996; de Lillo and Skoracka 2010; Navajas and Navia 2010). Until now, only a few morphometric analyses have been applied to phylogenetic studies of Eriophyoidea (Hong and Zhang 1996a, b, 1997), and few studies have assessed intraspecific variation in Eriophyoidea, including host-adapted strains or cryptic species (Skoracka et al 2002; Navia et al 2006; Skoracka and Kuczyński 2006; Magud et al 2007; Vidović et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because of their high adaptability; able to inhabit and infest all plant parts, except roots; and their capacity to transmit viruses (de Lillo and Skoracka 2010; Mielke-Ehret et al 2010). Eriophyoids may cause serious damage and malformation in affected plants, e.g., galls, bud malformation, leaf discoloration, witches broom, premature defoliation and fruit dropping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large number of eriophyoid species (de Lillo and Skoracka (2009) in this issue) suggests that members of this taxon speciate relatively quickly. The propensity of monophagy and oligophagy suggests close biochemical and morphological interactions with the host plant species, which scarcely has been investigated (de Lillo and Monfreda 2004; Monfreda and de Lillo 2006;Petanović and Kielkiewicz 2009 in this issue).…”
Section: Evolutionary Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…About 80% of currently known species of eriophyoid mites have been recorded in association with a single species of host plant in this issue). There are about 4,000 recognized species, 25% of which were named in the last 12 years, suggesting that many more remain to be discovered (de Lillo and Skoracka (2009) in this issue). Thus, there should be a large number of prospective agents available to discover.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%