2014
DOI: 10.3138/cbmh.31.2.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What’s a Guy To Do?: Contraceptive Responsibility, Confronting Masculinity, and the History of Vasectomy in Canada

Abstract: Abstract. Despite the growing popularity of vasectomy in recent years, historians have largely ignored the history of the procedure. The current article provides a preliminary examination of voluntary male sterilization in Canada and, in so doing, challenges the gendered paradigm scholars have often applied to the history of contraception. State-sponsored Medicare and late decriminalization of contraception are discussed as factors that slowed widespread adoption of vasectomy in Canada while evolving surgical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, albeit based on a large interview study with Mexican urology patients, anthropologist Emily Wentzell (2013;this issue) examines what men say and do when they negotiate reproductive aging and erectile dysfunction. Social-scientific scholarship has also explored how masculinity and reproduction entangle in ethnographic accounts of sperm donors (e.g., Almeling 2011;Mohr 2018), during contraceptive decision-making among men in Central and South America (e.g., Gutmann 2005;Wentzell 2013), in historical accounts of eugenic and sterilization practices (e.g., Balasubramanian 2018;Dyck 2013;Shropshire 2014), and in the history of hormonal contraceptives for men (e.g., Campo-Engelstein et al 2019;Oudshoorn 2003). There are also ethnographic accounts of men's experiences with infertility and in-vitro fertilization (IVF), including cultural ideals of masculinity (e.g., Inhorn 2012;Tjørnhøj-Thomsen 2009) as well as in cultural analyses that situate sperm as a normatively gendered fluid (Martin 1991;Moore 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, albeit based on a large interview study with Mexican urology patients, anthropologist Emily Wentzell (2013;this issue) examines what men say and do when they negotiate reproductive aging and erectile dysfunction. Social-scientific scholarship has also explored how masculinity and reproduction entangle in ethnographic accounts of sperm donors (e.g., Almeling 2011;Mohr 2018), during contraceptive decision-making among men in Central and South America (e.g., Gutmann 2005;Wentzell 2013), in historical accounts of eugenic and sterilization practices (e.g., Balasubramanian 2018;Dyck 2013;Shropshire 2014), and in the history of hormonal contraceptives for men (e.g., Campo-Engelstein et al 2019;Oudshoorn 2003). There are also ethnographic accounts of men's experiences with infertility and in-vitro fertilization (IVF), including cultural ideals of masculinity (e.g., Inhorn 2012;Tjørnhøj-Thomsen 2009) as well as in cultural analyses that situate sperm as a normatively gendered fluid (Martin 1991;Moore 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%