2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What risks to sustainability are identified throughout care bundle implementation and how can they be addressed? A mixed methods case study

Abstract: ObjectivesDespite national guidance on how to identify and treat heart failure (HF), variation in HF care persists across UK hospitals. Care bundles have been proposed as a mechanism to deliver reliable optimal care for patients; however, specific challenges to sustain care bundles in practice have been highlighted. With few studies providing insight into how to design or implement care bundles to optimise sustainability, there is little direction for practitioners seeking to ensure long-term impact of their i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a theoretical perspective, the empirically evidenced mechanisms (figure 2) uncovered in this review provide new insight into existing sustainability frameworks with specific relevance to hospital settings 17–20. The identified factors spanning before, during and after change implementation narrow an empirical gap in understanding the activities required to enhance sustainability 50. In particular, the factors and mechanisms beyond active implementation extend our understanding of the identified limits of current frameworks of change implementation in healthcare 41–43.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From a theoretical perspective, the empirically evidenced mechanisms (figure 2) uncovered in this review provide new insight into existing sustainability frameworks with specific relevance to hospital settings 17–20. The identified factors spanning before, during and after change implementation narrow an empirical gap in understanding the activities required to enhance sustainability 50. In particular, the factors and mechanisms beyond active implementation extend our understanding of the identified limits of current frameworks of change implementation in healthcare 41–43.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…[17][18][19][20] The identified factors spanning before, during and after change implementation narrow an empirical gap in understanding the activities required to enhance sustainability. 50 In particular, the factors and mechanisms beyond active implementation extend our understanding of the identified limits of current frameworks of change implementation in healthcare. [41][42][43] Additionally, this review elaborates on the mechanisms optimising the fit between the intervention and context.…”
Section: Contribution To Practice and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particular attention was paid to the long-term success of the initiative, and a separate study conducted to explore risks to sustainability. 16 Throughout the initiative, the team used the Web Improvement Support for Healthcare platform to collate, store and analyse data. 17 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefits measurement of initiatives that did not implement during the funded period of the project may be further challenged where further funding is required to sustain them. 8 Additionally, healthcare transformation projects often comprise a large diversity of stakeholders, of who those…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%