2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10798-010-9130-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What pupils can learn from working with robotic direct manipulation environments

Abstract: This study investigates what pupils aged 10-12 can learn from working with robots, assuming that understanding robotics is a sign of technological literacy. We conducted cognitive and conceptual analysis to develop a frame of reference for determining pupils' understanding of robotics. Four perspectives were distinguished with increasing sophistication; ''psychological'', ''technological'', ''function'', and ''controlled system''. Using LegoÒ MindstormsÒ NXT robots, as an example of a Direct Manipulation Envir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Five studies among the 47 reviewed focused on this aspect of robotics [37,[64][65][66][67] Commonly, the studies investigated how young children developed their conceptions of robots' behaviors and systems of robots.…”
Section: Young Children's Conceptualization Of Robots and Systems Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five studies among the 47 reviewed focused on this aspect of robotics [37,[64][65][66][67] Commonly, the studies investigated how young children developed their conceptions of robots' behaviors and systems of robots.…”
Section: Young Children's Conceptualization Of Robots and Systems Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, robotics STEM curricula can promote secondary school students' awareness of, interest in (Abaid, Kopman, & Porfiri, 2013;Cristoforis et al, 2013;Doerschuk et al, 2016;Jojoa et al, 2010), and careers in STEM (Cristoforis et al, 2013). Finally, robotics courses can provide opportunities for learning by doing and can enhance hands-on abilities (Slangen et al, 2011;Somyurek, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above all, most studies lacked discussion of mathematics and integrated STEM concepts (Alimisis, 2013;Nugent et al, 2016); these studies involved only small or isolated groups (Alimisis, 2013) with short interventions (Benitti, 2012). To have an encompassing view of the integrated robotics STEM curriculum (Benitti, 2012;Rihtaršič et al, 2016;Slangen et al, 2011), the effect of a regular curriculum should also be evaluated (Benitti, 2012;Eguchi, 2016). Therefore, this study explored the effects on students of a semester-long integrated robotics STEM course; the results were compared to those of learning in a LEGO ® robotics-based curriculum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bruder and Wedeward observed that outreach programs through robotics activities played an important role in encouraging students to explore the nature of engineering. Slangen, van Keulen, and Gravemeijer (2011) investigated the extent to which students learn when working with robots. They used LEGO Mindstorms NXT robotics kits to explore students' reasoning patterns and conceptual understanding.…”
Section: Informal Learning Programs In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%