2001
DOI: 10.1080/03007760108591801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What price, fame?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be easier to define traditional arts, at least for this research, by what they are not: modern, potentially commercial products of the post-colonial Western global culture (Sevik, 2001), or in the case of the former Soviet Union or Peoples Republic of China, state approved versions of historic or modern arts stripped of unwanted ideological content and context (e.g., Ahmed, 2006;Gerdes, 2008;Pang, 2005). This is not to say that modern arts are without value, benefit, or purpose, only that they are different.…”
Section: Arts In Traditional Indigenous and Aboriginal Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be easier to define traditional arts, at least for this research, by what they are not: modern, potentially commercial products of the post-colonial Western global culture (Sevik, 2001), or in the case of the former Soviet Union or Peoples Republic of China, state approved versions of historic or modern arts stripped of unwanted ideological content and context (e.g., Ahmed, 2006;Gerdes, 2008;Pang, 2005). This is not to say that modern arts are without value, benefit, or purpose, only that they are different.…”
Section: Arts In Traditional Indigenous and Aboriginal Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%