1998
DOI: 10.1159/000012285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Prevents Professional Drivers from Following Physicians’ Cardiologic Advice?

Abstract: Background: There is a scarcity of published studies of the effects of cardiac counselling among professional drivers (PD). Aims of the study were: (1) to examine explanatory variables for two classical ‘driver’ risk factors – body mass index (BMI), and smoking – and to analyse the interrelations among smoking cessation, losing weight and work-related life changes; (2) to assess the effectiveness of risk factor counselling after 6 months, and (3) to gain insight into possible discrepancies between PD perceptio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the studies were cross-sectional (26, 27, 29, 30, 31-34, 37, 42-45, 48-52). Two studies had a case-referent design (28,46). There were five independent longitudinal studies (35,36,(38)(39)(40)(41), and two repeatedmeasures studies (30,47).…”
Section: Methodological Characteristics and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the studies were cross-sectional (26, 27, 29, 30, 31-34, 37, 42-45, 48-52). Two studies had a case-referent design (28,46). There were five independent longitudinal studies (35,36,(38)(39)(40)(41), and two repeatedmeasures studies (30,47).…”
Section: Methodological Characteristics and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five studies (30,31,44,45,48) did not control for covariates and reported only univariate between-subject associations. Four studies (26,28,33,38) reported van der Hulst that included a particular outcome measure found an association with long workhours, the direction of the association (+ or -) is given in the last column of the table. If the association was found in more than one study and all studies that found an association corrected for covariates, a double plus (++) or a double minus (--) is used to indicate that the evidence for this association was particularly strong.…”
Section: Methodological Characteristics and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations