2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What predicts romantic relationship satisfaction and mate retention intensity: mate preference fulfillment or mate value discrepancies?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…they chose partners who are similar to themselves in terms of mate quality. Mate value discrepancies between one and one's partner can predict several relationship outcomes such as forgiveness and relationship satisfaction (Conroy-Beam et al 2016;Sidelinger and Booth-Butterfield 2007). These findings suggest that mate value can influence the formation of romantic relationships, as well as several factors associated with the maintenance of romantic relationships.…”
Section: Mate Value and Mate Retention Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…they chose partners who are similar to themselves in terms of mate quality. Mate value discrepancies between one and one's partner can predict several relationship outcomes such as forgiveness and relationship satisfaction (Conroy-Beam et al 2016;Sidelinger and Booth-Butterfield 2007). These findings suggest that mate value can influence the formation of romantic relationships, as well as several factors associated with the maintenance of romantic relationships.…”
Section: Mate Value and Mate Retention Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, this is not always the case, as we can be in a relationship with a partner who does not possess all the qualities we seek (lower mate value compared to ourselves). However, according to Conroy-Beam et al (2016), the discrepancy between what we want and what we get is not entirely clear, thus increasing the need to explore the role of mate value discrepancy in the functionality of romantic relationships.…”
Section: Mate Value Discrepancymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A lower satisfaction of high-MV women may result from more intensive mate guarding and impression of being trapped in the current relationship (Nowak and Danel 2014). Indeed, a recent study confirmed that MVD may affect mate retention behaviours through the relationship satisfaction (Conroy-Beam et al 2016). Taken together, the previously mentioned studies suggest that also the intensity of more specific negative forms of mate guarding such as controlling behaviours may be related to the difference between qualities of romantic partners.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Conroy-Beam & Buss, 2016a, 2016b, 2017Conroy-Beam, Goetz, & Buss, 2016 individual's ideal mate across all possible traits rather than studying individual traits.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Mating Strategies and Mate Choicementioning
confidence: 99%