2016
DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2016.1236044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Patients With Behavioral-Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Can Teach Us About Moral Responsibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, moral decision making incorporates several different neuropsychological processes including cognitive control ( 33 ), value or reward-based decision making ( 34 ), theory of mind ( 35 ), and empathy ( 27 ). The potential contributions of each process to criminal behavior are contested ( 36 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, moral decision making incorporates several different neuropsychological processes including cognitive control ( 33 ), value or reward-based decision making ( 34 ), theory of mind ( 35 ), and empathy ( 27 ). The potential contributions of each process to criminal behavior are contested ( 36 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results link lesions resulting in criminal behavior to regions whose activity is correlated with moral decision making, value-based decision making, and theory of mind in normal subjects. Exactly which psychological processes are abnormal or disrupted in criminals remains a matter of ongoing research and debate ( 36 ). It is also unknown whether deficits in moral decision making contribute to lesion-associated criminal behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, free will is commonly discussed as it relates to social, legal, and moral responsibility for decisions, not just movement (3,4). It remains unknown whether the network of brain regions we identify as related to free will for movements is the same as that important for moral decision making (58)(59)(60), as prior studies have suggested important differences (30).…”
Section: Preliminary Extension Of Network Localization To Neuroimagingmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The two target articles in this issue tackle different topics, but both are attempts to join the emerging neuroscientific image with our everyday conception of persons. Darby, Edersheim, and Price (2016) attempt to establish a compatibilist view of free will, and then use that position to display a new framework that could be used to determine when individuals with behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) can be considered morally responsible for their actions. Elsey and Kindt (2016) discuss new ways of modifying traumatic memories at the reconsolidation phase, that is, at the point of recall, and assess whether the therapeutic application of memory alteration is ethically permissible and even justified for individuals with post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each of the cases, the individuals are described as being aware of the reasons their behavior is wrong, but for patients with bvFTD, desired ends become more motivating than moral reasons. The limitation of the proposed approach by Darby, Edersheim, and Price (2016) is that it could be used to explain most, if not all, immoral behavior. Consider, for example, individuals who know that cheating on their spouse is immoral but nonetheless repeatedly commit adultery.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%