2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1958-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Patients Say About Their Doctors Online: A Qualitative Content Analysis

Abstract: The majority of Internet reviews of primary care physicians are positive in nature. Our findings reaffirm that the care encounter extends beyond the patient-physician dyad; staff, access, and convenience all affect patient's reviews of physicians. In addition, negative interpersonal reviews underscore the importance of well-perceived bedside manner for a successful patient-physician interaction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
185
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
12
185
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…33 Although physicians may believe that negative ratings outnumber positive ones on physician-rating Web sites, 34 numerous studies have found that not to be the case. 20,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] This finding is consistent with what is known about consumer-sourced rating systems in general. In our study, parents reported posting positive ratings for physicians more often than negative ratings, by a factor of 3 to 1.…”
Section: -33supporting
confidence: 82%
“…33 Although physicians may believe that negative ratings outnumber positive ones on physician-rating Web sites, 34 numerous studies have found that not to be the case. 20,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] This finding is consistent with what is known about consumer-sourced rating systems in general. In our study, parents reported posting positive ratings for physicians more often than negative ratings, by a factor of 3 to 1.…”
Section: -33supporting
confidence: 82%
“…1 The provision of rankings (e.g., star ratings) may be interpreted to imply that physician rating websites measure quality. Thus an important question to explore is whether physician rating website star ratings have validity for assessing the quality of care.…”
Section: How Do Patients and Physicians Perceive The Ratings And Commmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,3 Compared to numerical ratings, narrative ratings may receive a disproportionate share of attention. Numerical or star ratings can be summarized with a mean score, but narrative comments are individually displayed and draw the reader's gaze.…”
Section: How Do Patients and Physicians Perceive The Ratings And Commmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there is an increasing number of sites where users rate doctors. Several works have analyzed the content and scores of such reviews, mostly by manually examining a subset of them [4,5,6,7]. However, not much work has studied how to automatically classify doctor reviews.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…López et al performed a qualitative content analysis of doctor reviews [6]. They found that most reviews were positive and identified three over-arching domains in the reviews they analyzed: interpersonal manner, technical competence and system issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%