What 'outliers' tell us about missed opportunities for tuberculosis control: a cross-sectional study of patients in Mumbai, India

Abstract

BackgroundIndia's Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) is deemed highly successful in terms of detection and cure rates. However, some patients experience delays in accessing diagnosis and treatment. Patients falling between the 96th and 100th percentiles for these access indicators are often ignored as atypical 'outliers' when assessing programme performance. They may, however, provide clues to understanding why some patients never reach the programme. This paper examines the underlying vulnerabilities of patients with extreme values for delays in accessing the RNTCP in Mumbai city, India.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study with 266 new sputum positive patients registered with the RNTCP in Mumbai. Patients were classified as 'outliers' if patient, provider and system delays were beyond the 95th percentile for the respective variable. Case profiles of 'outliers' for patient, provider and system delays were examined and compared with the rest of the sample to identify key factors responsible for delays.ResultsForty-two patients were 'outliers' on one or more of the delay variables. All 'outliers' had a significantly lower per capita income than the remaining sample. The lack of economic resources was compounded by social, structural and environmental vulnerabilities. Longer patient delays were related to patients' perception of symptoms as non-serious. Provider delays were incurred as a result of private providers' failure to respond to tuberculosis in a timely manner. Diagnostic and treatment delays were minimal, however, analysis of the 'outliers' revealed the importance of social support in enabling access to the programme.ConclusionA proxy for those who fail to reach the programme, these case profiles highlight unique vulnerabilities that need innovative approaches by the RNTCP. The focus on 'outliers' provides a less resource- and time-intensive alternative to community-based studies for understanding the barriers to reaching public health programmes.

Patient and health system delay among new pulmonary tuberculosis patients diagnosed at medical college hospitals in Puducherry, India

“…The magnitude of total, patient and health system delays ranged between 60-62 days, 6-23 days and 9-34 days respectively. 16,21,22 In the present study, the median patients' delay was 36 days. This delay is similar to other community based studies done in South India [16][17][18] but some studies done in Maharashtra shows median patient delay of 47-95 days.…”

“…Urban studies done shows a median delay of as short as 6 days. 21 This reflects that the patient delay is more among TB patients residing in rural areas and could In the present study median health system delay was 28.5 days. Similar study done in Bangalore showed a median health system delay of 18 days but the study setting among two studies varies.…”

Durations and Delays in Care Seeking, Diagnosis and Treatment Initiation in Uncomplicated Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in Mumbai, India

“…[ 12 , 13 ] This is especially important for vulnerable populations like slum dwellers, who form the low socio-economic and underserved sections of the community. [ 14 , 15 ]…”

Delays in diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in India: a systematic review

“…However, four studies 17, 19, 24, 34 defined the end point of HSD as the initiation of (correct) anti-TB treatment. Additionally, six studies 22-24, 28, 30, 31 separately defined the interval between confirmation of diagnosis and initiation of anti-TB treatment as treatment delay. Nine studies did not provide definitions for either HSD or DxD and RxD.…”