What motivates physicians to propose private services in a mixed private-public healthcare system? A mixed methods study

Abstract

Background Implementation of private elements, including private insurances, in public healthcare system is now common in many countries, and its impacts have been well studied. Little, however, is known about the motives leading physicians, major role players in the system, to promote the usage of private services. The aim of this study was to explore the various motives leading physicians within public systems to propose private services to their patients, while examining the possible associations to their specialty and level of commitment. Methods A total of 197 physicians from specialisms loaded more to private/public sectors participated in a cross-sectional telephone survey regarding their attitudes on their practices, private insurances, access to healthcare, and job satisfaction. The association between the likert scale questions to their recommendation to purchase private insurance, and the commitment they felt towards patients were analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) as well as logistic regression models. Results Our findings suggest physicians engaged in dual practice are less likely to promote private insurances among their patients if they are satisfied with their public job (OR = 0.92, 95%CI 0.89,0.94). Physicians perceived private insurances as beneficial for patients, were found likely to promote them (OR = 1.65, %95CI 1.16, 2.35). The commitment physicians felt toward patients who paid out-of-pocket money was associated to their sense of being trusted and valued (OR = 1.99, 95%CI 1.33, 2.88; OR = 1.5, 95%CI 1.05, 2.13 respectively). Conclusion This study suggests a deeper understanding of physicians’ daily experience of the private-public mix and it’s consequences, and could provide a platform for future studies. Further studies on physician’s role in health privatization processes are needed, and could aid policymakers in their efforts to strengthen healthcare systems around the world.

How ready is the health care system in Northeast India for surgical delivery? a mixed-methods study on surgical capacity and need

“…Essential procedures were expensive at non-government facilities, which has implications for affordability and equity of access within the system. More broadly, this example provides further evidence on the factors motivating referral to private facilities [ 29 ]. In addition to doctors’ personal interest and circumstance as motivators in some contexts, our work shows that doctors’ assessment of patients’ financial ability and preferences also factor into referral to better-equipped (with investigation technology) or cheaper (public facilities, or electing for more technologically advanced procedures (e.g., laparoscopy).…”

Attitudes toward depression among Ecuadorian physicians using the Spanish-validated version of the Revised Depression Attitude Questionnaire (R-DAQ)

“…Additionally, those who work in the private sector (B, 1.952), or in the private/public sector (B, 2.106), have higher therapeutic optimism regarding depression than those who work exclusively in the public sector. According to researchers, dissatisfaction with income levels affects how physicians feel and what they recommend to their patients daily [ 24 ].…”

Dual Use of Public and Private Health Care Services in Brazil

“…It is common to find a combination of public and private healthcare systems in both low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries [1][2][3]. In LMICs, such a combination often entails underfunded public care and restricted access to private providers.…”