What motivates general practitioners to change practice behaviour? A qualitative study of audit and feedback group sessions in Dutch general practice

Abstract

ObjectivesAdopting an attributional perspective, the current article investigates how audit and feedback group sessions contribute to general practitioners’ (GPs) motivation to change their practice behaviour to improve care. We focus on the contributions of the audit and feedback itself (content) and the group discussion (process).MethodsFour focus groups, comprising a total of 39 participating Dutch GPs, discussed and compared audit and feedback of their practices. The focus groups were analysed thematically.ResultsAudit and feedback contributed to GPs’ motivation to change in two ways: by raising awareness about aspects of their current care practice and by providing indications of the possible impact of change. For these contributions to play out, the audit and feedback should be reliable and valid, specific, recent and recurrent and concern GPs’ own practices or practices within their own influence sphere. Care behaviour attributed to external, uncontrollable or unstable causes would not induce change. The added value of the group is twofold as well: group discussion contributed to GPs’ motivation to change by providing a frame of reference and by affording insights that participants would not have been able to achieve on their own.ConclusionsIn audit and feedback group sessions, both audit and feedback information and group discussion can valuably contribute to GPs’ motivation to change care practice behaviour. Peer interaction can positively contribute to explore alternative practices and avenues for improvement. Local or regional peer meetings would be beneficial in facilitating reflection and discussion. An important avenue for future studies is to explore the contribution of audit and feedback and small-group discussion to actual practice change.

Small and Large Animal Veterinarian Perceptions of Antimicrobial Use Metrics for Hospital-Based Stewardship in the United States

“…It has been demonstrated, however, that the effects of these interventions vary greatly and are not improving over time (13,73). Simply providing professionals with data is not enough to stimulate change in the way they perform their work (74). Numbers must have salience and meaning to the individuals whose behavior is targeted for change.…”

Rationale, design and initial results of an educational intervention to improve provider-initiated HIV testing in primary care

“…Our ongoing programme has several strengths. The intervention uses multiple evidence-based elements for performance improvement ( Table 1 ): graphical audit and feedback is a proven effective intervention ( 28 ); small-scale interactive sessions are more successful than traditional strategies, such as one-time lectures; and multifaceted programmes are recommended, including elements such as group discussion and designing quality improvement plans ( 15–21 ). We aimed to create a sustainable effect by adopting those elements that were proven sustainably effective in comparable settings ( 29 ).…”

Understanding how and why quality circles improve standards of practice, enhance professional development and increase psychological well-being of general practitioners: a realist synthesis

“…According to our interview data, GPs can risk doing this in a QC group where they feel safe and confident, a process described in educational literature (CMO configurations 3 e and 4 g in figure 2). 36–40…”