2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.11.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What model resolution is required in climatological downscaling over complex terrain?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this huge developing challenge in the Middle East, there is a specific need to depict a complete and more accurate picture of future water scarcity and drought under climate change conditions to ensure water security and diminish the negative effects and the costs to the society. The projections of global climate models (GCMs) point to an overall drying signal for the Middle East (Dai 2013, IPCC 2013; however, the precipitation simulations by GCMs with a coarse spatial resolution of 1°-3°may be biased for the region with a complex terrain (Black et al 2010) and variable land surfaces (e.g., mountains, deserts, coastlines, inland water bodies) (Maraun et al 2017, El-Samra et al 2018. A more trustworthy representation of the land surface features along with a better simulation of meso-spatial scale processes and the atmospheric circulation and gradients are provided at finer spatial resolutions of regional climate models (RCMs) (Torma et al 2015, Mohan and Sati 2016, Lucas-Picher et al 2017, Ahmadalipour and Moradkhani 2018, Minder et al 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this huge developing challenge in the Middle East, there is a specific need to depict a complete and more accurate picture of future water scarcity and drought under climate change conditions to ensure water security and diminish the negative effects and the costs to the society. The projections of global climate models (GCMs) point to an overall drying signal for the Middle East (Dai 2013, IPCC 2013; however, the precipitation simulations by GCMs with a coarse spatial resolution of 1°-3°may be biased for the region with a complex terrain (Black et al 2010) and variable land surfaces (e.g., mountains, deserts, coastlines, inland water bodies) (Maraun et al 2017, El-Samra et al 2018. A more trustworthy representation of the land surface features along with a better simulation of meso-spatial scale processes and the atmospheric circulation and gradients are provided at finer spatial resolutions of regional climate models (RCMs) (Torma et al 2015, Mohan and Sati 2016, Lucas-Picher et al 2017, Ahmadalipour and Moradkhani 2018, Minder et al 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we opted not to adopt a convective parameterization for the largest domain (9 km) based on that body of literature and our own previous studies in Talbot et al () and Li et al (). The same WRF configuration used here also performed well in historic simulations over the study area forced by the National Centers for Environment Prediction Final Analysis (FNL) data (1° resolution; El‐Samra et al, , ). We changed the atmospheric equivalent CO 2 concentration in each simulated year of WRF to match the respective scenarios RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 and to be consistent with HIRAM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The inner nested domain (d02; 462 km × 579 km) has a spatial resolution of 3 km and is focused on the study area (Figures b and c). The highest resolution of 3 km was shown to be sufficient in previous tests comparing historic WRF simulations over the study area to a wide array of ground observations; no significant improvement was noted when the resolution was further increased to 1 km (El‐Samra et al, ). Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS; Friedl et al, ) land use data were adopted with 21 land categories and Lambert Conformal projection (most suitable for midlatitude locations since it results in nearly uniform grid spacing).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations