What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups

Abstract

This longitudinal study examined factors that contribute to the persistence of underrepresented racial minority (URM) undergraduates in STEM fields. The primary source of data came from the Cooperative Institutional Research Program's 2004 The Freshman Survey (TFS) and 2008 College Senior Survey (CSS). The sample included 3,670 students at 217 institutions who indicated on the TFS that they intended to major in a STEM field, 1,634 of whom were underrepresented minority (URM) students. Findings indicate that Black and Latino undergraduates were significantly less likely to persist in STEM majors than were their White and Asian American counterparts. Background characteristics and college experiences moderated this race effect, suggesting both that pre‐college factors may explain some of the observed racial disparities and that individual institutions can take more concrete actions to improve science achievement. Findings from the follow‐up analysis of the sample of URMs suggest that institutions can improve URM STEM persistence by increasing the likelihood that those students will engage in key academic experiences: studying frequently with others, participating in undergraduate research, and involvement in academic clubs or organizations. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 51: 555–580, 2014

Assessment of student learning using augmented reality Grand Canyon field trips for mobile smart devices

“…While the results of this study show that student interest is a statistically significant predictor of student learning, it is not a major driver of increased posttest scores. Gender and ethnicity were considered as predictor variables because of the nation-wide and decades-long concern over low numbers of minorities in STEM fields (Ashby, 2006;National Research Council, 2011;Chang et al, 2014). Gender and ethnicity had no significant impact on gains from pre-to posttest scores, and these variables were also not significant predictors of student interest and motivation to learn the geosciences (Gilbert et al, 2012;Bursztyn et al, 2017).…”

The Roots of Science, Mathematics and Engineering Self-confidence in College Students: Voices of Successful Undergraduate Women

“…Therefore, a mixed methods research study was used that combined the use of an online survey for quantitative analysis and five focus groups for qualitative analysis. The questions for both instruments were selected and modified based upon published studies in order that the results from this study to be compared to national trends 8,[10][11][12] .…”

“…Data was gathered through nine open-ended questions that allowed students to provide direct quotations. The focus group sessions were designed to last about one hour long and used a question guide with nine questions developed using key areas to probe based on a review of the literature and interview questions developed for similar studies 10,11 .…”

Investigating the Effect of Freshman Minority Engineering Student Participation in a Minority Summer Bridge Program on Engineering Self-Efficacy and Early Academic Success at a Predominantly-White Institution

“…This framework takes into account "student precollege characteristics and experiences, the organizational context, the student peer environment, and, finally, the individual student experience" (Reason, 2009, p. 662). There are well-established differences in patterns of academic achievement and course-taking among incoming engineering students (Chang et al 2014;Sass 2015;Tyson et al 2007). These differences can express themselves as differences in the likelihood of academic success in college (Strayhorn, 2015).…”