2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2004.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What makes students click: working memory and look-up behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Students do have access to a glossary providing translations, but the glossing that does occur with pictures is in the target language only. In support of this usage, Chun and Payne (2004) indicate that previous studies have shown that the use of multimedia glosses for vocabulary have been found to have higher retention rates when learners look up a picture or associates words with pictures as opposed to looking up translations alone. Lomicka's work (1998) with glossing also suggests that a deeper level of text comprehension may be advanced when a full array of glossing is available to the students, which was evidenced in the study by the ability of the learner, who had glossing available to them, to make correct inferences.…”
Section: Organization Of the Materials In Content Modulessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Students do have access to a glossary providing translations, but the glossing that does occur with pictures is in the target language only. In support of this usage, Chun and Payne (2004) indicate that previous studies have shown that the use of multimedia glosses for vocabulary have been found to have higher retention rates when learners look up a picture or associates words with pictures as opposed to looking up translations alone. Lomicka's work (1998) with glossing also suggests that a deeper level of text comprehension may be advanced when a full array of glossing is available to the students, which was evidenced in the study by the ability of the learner, who had glossing available to them, to make correct inferences.…”
Section: Organization Of the Materials In Content Modulessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In those cases, the words clicked by students, the numbers of clicks, and other keyboard activities, were automatically logged. Student behavioural data such as time on task and navigation patterns could be derived from the raw data (Hwu, 2013) and the effect of the glossary consultation behaviour was checked against vocabulary or reading competence (Chun & Payne, 2004;Hulstijn, 2000;Laufer, 2000;Lomicka, 1998). Indeed, even if human-computer interactions were often reported quantitatively (e.g., how many lookups, time spent, etc.…”
Section: Previous Call Studies That Tracked Learner Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study employing Daneman and Carpenter's test with ESL learners, Abu-Rabia (2003) found that WM correlated with L2 reading and creative writing, and with the ability to process referents of distant pronouns. In contrast to these studies, Taguchi (2008) and Chun and Payne (2004) also used Daneman and Carpenter's test but found no WM effects on either L2 English comprehension of conversational implicatures or L2 German reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition respectively. The lack of effects could be due to methodological variations of the original RST (e.g., Chun & Payne's participants checked which sentence-fi nal words had appeared in the preceding set instead of recalling the words themselves) or to how Daneman and Carpenter measured processing (reading aloud does not ensure semantic processing).…”
Section: Working Memory and L2 Comprehension And Productionmentioning
confidence: 78%