2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1528077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Makes Online Content Viral?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
78
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings should be interpreted with the following limitations. The messages examined in this study are brief textual arguments extracted from televised antismoking public service announcements, and the content characteristics we tested are not exhaustive of all potential features of those public service announcements influencing the selection and retransmission behaviors, such as efficacy information (15,21,59) and psychophysiologically arousing audio/visual features (44,60,61). In addition, this study was an analog study, where selection was realistic (but forced) but retransmission was hypothetical using a self-reported measure of behavioral intention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings should be interpreted with the following limitations. The messages examined in this study are brief textual arguments extracted from televised antismoking public service announcements, and the content characteristics we tested are not exhaustive of all potential features of those public service announcements influencing the selection and retransmission behaviors, such as efficacy information (15,21,59) and psychophysiologically arousing audio/visual features (44,60,61). In addition, this study was an analog study, where selection was realistic (but forced) but retransmission was hypothetical using a self-reported measure of behavioral intention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People tend to talk about unusual or surprising events to make sense of them (47,48). Previous research has found that surprising or counterintuitive news articles are more frequently shared (44,49) and that folktales and jokes are spread more widely if they have a contrasting event that creates surprise (50). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Later in the paper, we follow Berger and Milkman (2011) and analyze the nature of the content posted. 7 However, the split slightly overstates the mean-difference since it is driven by a few outliers.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dealing with diffusion through a social network, we assume that the knowledge spreads by (informational) contagion. This viral attitude is testified in many empirical works (Berger andMilkman 2012, Phelps et al 2004). From a modeling viewpoint, following recent literature on contagion applied to a social environment (see, for instance, Dai Pra and Tolotti 2009 and Barucci and Tolotti 2012), we assume that agent i becomes aware at a random time  i .…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…They point out that a hub's customer value has to include the effect on others. Focusing on individual-level psychological processes, Berger and Milkman (2012) show that emotions whose content evokes in individuals, help determine which cultural items succeed in the marketplace of ideas, that is at the macro-level. The relation between emotion and diffusion or virality is very complex and relevant in the marketing perspective.…”
Section: The Micro-foundation: Agent-based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%