What makes health systems resilient against infectious disease outbreaks and natural hazards? Results from a scoping review

Abstract

Background The 2014–2016 Ebola outbreak was a wake-up call regarding the critical importance of resilient health systems. Fragile health systems can become overwhelmed during public health crises, further exacerbating the human, economic, and political toll. Important work has been done to describe the general attributes of a health system resilient to these crises, and the next step will be to identify the specific capacities that health systems need to develop and maintain to achieve resiliency. Methods We conducted a scoping review of the literature to identify recurring themes and capacities needed for health system resiliency to infectious disease outbreaks and natural hazards and any existing implementation frameworks that highlight these capacities. We also sought to identify the overlap of the identified themes and capacities with those highlighted in the World Health Organization’s Joint External Evaluation. Sources of evidence included PubMed, Web of Science, OAIster, and the websites of relevant major public health organizations. Results We identified 16 themes of health system resilience, including: the need to develop plans for altered standards of care during emergencies, the need to develop plans for post-event recovery, and a commitment to quality improvement. Most of the literature described the general attributes of a resilient health system; no implementation frameworks were identified that could translate these elements into specific capacities that health system actors can employ to improve resilience to outbreaks and natural hazards in a variety of settings. Conclusions An implementation-oriented health system resilience framework could help translate the important components of a health system identified in this review into specific capacities that actors in the health system could work to develop to improve resilience to public health crises. However, there remains a need to further refine the concept of resilience so that health systems can simultaneously achieve sustainable transformations in healthcare practice and health service delivery as well as improve their preparedness for emergencies.

Tackling COVID-19: Can the African continent play the long game?

“…There are a few signs of the increasing resilience of African health systems to manage outbreaks [18]. However most African countries are still spending below their former Abuja agreement (15% of public revenue on health) [19] with parallel emphasis on the need to prioritize primary health care (PHC) expenditures.…”

Voices from the frontline: findings from a thematic analysis of a rapid online global survey of maternal and newborn health professionals facing the COVID-19 pandemic

“…21 Other indirect consequences of previous infectious disease outbreaks include less healthcare utilisation and limited capacity for public health surveillance. [22][23][24] These impacts can persist long after the disease outbreak is contained. 25 However, much of the evidence available about these impacts on maternal and newborn health is either modelled or is from studies using secondary data such as population-based surveys and routine health management information system analysis.…”

Health System Adaptability at Primary Level Care in the Time of COIVD-19: Experiences From Ethiopia

“…It requires strengthening health systems both before and during an outbreak, including the metrics of health system performance, in order to provide guidance for actors involved in the response activities (4). Most of the literature described the general attributes of a resilient health system, but no implementation frameworks were identi ed that could translate these elements into speci c capacities that health system actors can employ to improve resilience to outbreaks including COVID-19 in a variety of settings (8)(9)(10).…”