2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What makes aromatic polyamide membranes superior: New insights into ion transport and membrane structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, R 2 -NH 2 + densities would be representative of the total R 2 -NH content (i.e., surface and interior). The roughly constant value for Br − uptake below pH 7 also suggests that the counterion probe is associating with ionized amine groups rather than being cosorbed alongside protons, as has been recently proposed for fully aromatic polyamides (33)(34)(35). If proton uptake was the predominant means by which Br − was associated into the membrane, one would instead expect an exponential increase in Br − uptake as pH decreases.…”
Section: Areal R 2 -Nhmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In this case, R 2 -NH 2 + densities would be representative of the total R 2 -NH content (i.e., surface and interior). The roughly constant value for Br − uptake below pH 7 also suggests that the counterion probe is associating with ionized amine groups rather than being cosorbed alongside protons, as has been recently proposed for fully aromatic polyamides (33)(34)(35). If proton uptake was the predominant means by which Br − was associated into the membrane, one would instead expect an exponential increase in Br − uptake as pH decreases.…”
Section: Areal R 2 -Nhmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This implies that the highly rejecting commercial RO membranes may have a higher crosslinking ratio compared to lower rejecting membranes. Furthermore, recent research [57] showed that the pH dependent performance of seawater polyamide RO membranes cannot be correlated with the pH dependence of the membrane charge. Similarly, in this study the brackish water type Koch XR membrane showed only a small increase in negative surface charge, from -11 to -12 mV, as pH was increased from 6 to 10 while its rejection increased significantly from 55 to 77%.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low molecular mass and chemical properties of VFAs enable NF and RO to be plausible choices. RO membranes offer the tightest pores for pressure-driven processes and accordingly have the highest rejection for ionic species, along with a reasonable water flux and energy consumption thanks to the intensive R&D and optimization works of the past decades by the scientific and industrial community [ 8 , 9 , 10 ]. In RO, solution pH levels where VFAs are mainly in ionized forms seem to increase the retention properties up to 99.7% [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%