2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What makes a major change of wildlife management policy possible? Institutional analysis of Polish wolf governance

Abstract: Poland was one of the first countries of Central and Eastern Europe with stable wolf populations to effectively introduce year-round protection of the species. This paper traces the process of policy change using institutional theory as an organizational perspective. Based on the analysis of data from desk research and semi-structured interviews, we propose a model of institutional change and argue that in the 1990s, environmental activists and wildlife biologists successfully used a political window of opport… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of particular interest are the results obtained in terms of attitude comparisons between periods as far as conservationists are concerned. Contrary to the first period in which only positive attitudes were reported, during the second one, one negative [67] and two neutral attitudes [22,59] were registered. Niedziałkowski and Putkowska-Smoter (2020) [67] stated that some foresters benefitted from organising wolf hunts for Polish and international hunters, while others believe in and recognize the ecological value of wolves within the ecosystem (i.e., through limiting ungulate densities, they indirectly have a positive impact on forest plantations).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of particular interest are the results obtained in terms of attitude comparisons between periods as far as conservationists are concerned. Contrary to the first period in which only positive attitudes were reported, during the second one, one negative [67] and two neutral attitudes [22,59] were registered. Niedziałkowski and Putkowska-Smoter (2020) [67] stated that some foresters benefitted from organising wolf hunts for Polish and international hunters, while others believe in and recognize the ecological value of wolves within the ecosystem (i.e., through limiting ungulate densities, they indirectly have a positive impact on forest plantations).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Contrary to the first period in which only positive attitudes were reported, during the second one, one negative [67] and two neutral attitudes [22,59] were registered. Niedziałkowski and Putkowska-Smoter (2020) [67] stated that some foresters benefitted from organising wolf hunts for Polish and international hunters, while others believe in and recognize the ecological value of wolves within the ecosystem (i.e., through limiting ungulate densities, they indirectly have a positive impact on forest plantations). However, at the local and regional levels, foresters did not particularly endorse wolf protection and sometimes outright criticized conservation initiatives.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…One of the definitive hosts for this tapeworm is wolf Canis lupus ( Filip and Demiaszkiewicz, 2016 ). The growing population of wolves in Poland, resulting from effective protection since 1998 ( Niedziałkowski and Putkowska-Smoter, 2020 ), may lead to an increase of E . granulosus infection in moose and other wild ruminants as intermediate hosts, required for the development of eggs to the larval stages (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%