What Limits the Effectiveness of School-based Anti-smoking Programmes?

Abstract

SUMMARYBackround: It is generally accepted that living in families where there are smokers, children are stressed not only by the harmful physical exposure to second-hand and third-hand tobacco smoke, but also by the negative models of the adult relatives' behaviour, as relatives who smoke can inspire children to imitate this behaviour, influencing attitudes towards, and early experiments with smoking. In this paper, some of the most important results about influence of family smoking on the effects of the anti-smoking educational programme "Non-smoking Is Normal" are described.Methods: The school-based programme was created by medical and educational specialists and targets children at the first level of primary schools (aged from 6 to 11 years). The data about interesting outcomes of the programme (knowledge, attitudes, behaviour) were collected by anonymous questionnaire, administered twice in each school year: one month before the complex of 5 lectures (pre-tests) and 4-5 months after the last lecture (post-tests). The sample of participants (860-910) was divided into four groups, according to the intervention and family backrounds: (1) programme children from smoking families "P-S"; (2) control children from smoking families "C-S"; (3) programme children from non-smoking families "P-NS"; (4) control children from non-smoking families "C-NS". The differences in the frequency of children's answers were analysed using the tests in statistic Epi Info software, version 6.04a (chi-square, Mantel Haenszel, Yates, Fisher).Results: In the programme group, the number of children with smoking relatives was significantly higher than in the control group (80.1% vs. 73.0%, p<0.01) as well as of those who reported frequent/daily exposure to secondhand smoke at homes and/or in cars (49.5% vs. 40.0%, p<0.01). Smoking families significantly influenced the children's seeking of smoking friends (40% vs. 17%, p<0.01). The programme has significantly increased the amount of knowledge about health risks of smoking. Both in the programme and control groups of children from non-smoking families, the frequency of critics of adults smoking was significantly higher all the time of the study (p<0.05 and 0.01 resp.); however, the programme influenced children's opinions about smoking (criticism) only partially. Children's actual intentions about their smoking in the future was fully influenced by their smoking household environment: the number of "future no-smokers" has decreased in time and was significantly less frequent among children from smoking families (p<0.01). The frequency of those willing to smoke significantly increased within the period between 3rd and 5th grades, both in the programme and the control groups (p<0.01). An almost linear increase of active experimentations with cigarette smoking in follow-up monitoring was seen, trends of smoking children were steeper in groups from smoking families. The number of experiments with smoking was significantly lower in programme children of non-smoking parents only at the end of t...

Evaluation of a tobacco prevention programme among teenagers in Sweden

“…Further, it has been shown that having smoking family members decreased the efficacy of a school-based smoking prevention programme. 36 Thus, involving the family in smoking prevention seems to be a good idea. However, although the prevention programme in our study involved the child and an adult, and was a collaboration between schools, Norrbotten county council and local organisations, the participation rate was low, as only 50% chose to join the programme.…”

Evaluation of Social Impact Within Primary School Health Promotion: A Systematic Review

“…Recent systematic reviews on health promotion have focused on direct, measurable outcomes of interventions such as awareness, knowledge, behavior (either observed or reported, for example, increased consumption of fruit, levels of physical activity, or intentions to not start smoking) 27,28 or anthropometric measurement (standard body measurements such as such as weight, height, skinfolds, and waist circumference). 29,30 This focus on direct, measurable individual outcomes is reflected in current reviews on healthy eating (inclusive of nutrition and obesity prevention) which have found that outcomes were predominately anthropometric change, with mixed results reported for efficacy and use of theoretical frameworks.…”

Interplay of Direct Anti-Smoking Public Service Advertisements and Anti-Smoking Messages Placement Disclosures in Movies with Attitude to Quit Smoking

“…Children judge smoking messages and advertisements through media selfserving (Hrubá & Zaloudíková, 2012). A survey with two studies checking the smoking and anti-smoking ads' third-person effect on children checked the impact of cigarette advertisements and anti-smoking ads.…”