2004
DOI: 10.2307/3267942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Laws Were "Not Good"? A Canonical Approach to the Theological Problem of Ezekiel 20:25-26

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some commentators have pointed out that verse 26 makes no explicit mention of human sacrifice and, further, that there is no biblical or archaeological evidence that the law of the firstborn was practiced regularly as child sacrifice to YHWH (Greenberg 1983:369−370). Hahn and Bergsma (2004) suggest that the phrase 'everything that opens the womb' is a reference to animal sacrifice and explain it as a priestly reaction to a Deuteronomic treatment of sacrifice. For a recent treatment of key issues on the question of child sacrifice see Stavrakopoulou (2004).…”
Section: Idolatry and Sinai: A Fine Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some commentators have pointed out that verse 26 makes no explicit mention of human sacrifice and, further, that there is no biblical or archaeological evidence that the law of the firstborn was practiced regularly as child sacrifice to YHWH (Greenberg 1983:369−370). Hahn and Bergsma (2004) suggest that the phrase 'everything that opens the womb' is a reference to animal sacrifice and explain it as a priestly reaction to a Deuteronomic treatment of sacrifice. For a recent treatment of key issues on the question of child sacrifice see Stavrakopoulou (2004).…”
Section: Idolatry and Sinai: A Fine Linementioning
confidence: 99%