2011
DOI: 10.1080/13614576.2011.574495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Journal Authors Want: Ten Years of Results from Elsevier's Author Feedback Programme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors are not only "customers" but also content providers, and the content determines the academic level of a journal. Many attempts have been made to examine authors' concerns and expectations of journals (Coles, 1993;Mabe & Mulligan, 2011;Nicholas, Jamali, & Rowlands, 2006;Pitts & Stanley, 2007;Rowlands, Nicholas, & Huntington, 2004). However, the respondents in these studies are drawn largely from North America and Europe (see for example Rowlands et al, 2004) with few researchers concentrating on the perceptions of authors from other regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Authors are not only "customers" but also content providers, and the content determines the academic level of a journal. Many attempts have been made to examine authors' concerns and expectations of journals (Coles, 1993;Mabe & Mulligan, 2011;Nicholas, Jamali, & Rowlands, 2006;Pitts & Stanley, 2007;Rowlands, Nicholas, & Huntington, 2004). However, the respondents in these studies are drawn largely from North America and Europe (see for example Rowlands et al, 2004) with few researchers concentrating on the perceptions of authors from other regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Results from the annual summaries of the 2002 and 2009 "Elsevier Author Feedback Program" [5] indicate eight key factors authors consider when choosing a journal outlet. In both the 2002 and 2009 summaries, the most important factors were intrinsic characteristics of the journal: refereeing quality and refereeing speed.…”
Section: Academic Authors and Publishing Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Journal attributes refers to a set of eight possible considerations that academic authors may take into account when choosing a journal outlet in which to publish their work. These eight attributes, which were drawn from both previous research (commonly referred to as "factors") [3,5] and the focus groups conducted among this population prior to the survey include audience, editor or editorial board, fit with scope of journal, impact factor, likelihood of acceptance, open access, quality and reputation of journal, and time from submission to publication. Respondents were also given the opportunity to list other attributes they consider when choosing a journal outlet for their research.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For 31 These studies have the advantage of scale but are limited by their broad coverage across numerous disciplines and their focus on company-specific issues. An example of publications from consultancies is OutSell's 2014 report on information needs amongst engineering and science professionals.…”
Section: Locating Information On End-users: External Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%