2006
DOI: 10.1353/rap.2006.0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is This a Picture Of?: Some Thoughts on Images and Archives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The images were widely used in government literature, and were distributed free of charge to news agencies, book and periodicals publishers. They were also supplied for exhibitions (FSA/OWI ; Melville , 11; Finnegan , 53–56, Finnegan ; Cohen , xxv–xxvi; Stange , 108–11).…”
Section: Sources and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The images were widely used in government literature, and were distributed free of charge to news agencies, book and periodicals publishers. They were also supplied for exhibitions (FSA/OWI ; Melville , 11; Finnegan , 53–56, Finnegan ; Cohen , xxv–xxvi; Stange , 108–11).…”
Section: Sources and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cataloguing the photographs by the Library of Congress relied substantially on information contained in captions (FSA/OWI ; Fleischhauer and Brannan 330–42). It should be noted that historians have explored the way in which the contentious and inevitably subjective schema used to classify photographs can transform interpretations of the image (Finnegan ; Rose ; Trachtenberg ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relational architecture builds on scholarly work that exemplifies how researchers can and do read and respond productively (Enoch & VanHaitsma, 2015;Finnegan, 2006;Gaillet, 2012;Graban, 2013;Gries, 2013), and further develops methodologies that pushes back against the power inherent in the voices of official resources (Kirsch & Royster, 2010;Kirsch & Sullivan, 1992;Royster & Williams, 1999) to make the infrastructure itself able to support multiplicity, transparency, and evolving connectivity. Pulling back not only to view, but also to construct, the infrastructure of the archive as rhetorical means allows researchers to be contributing users who are more akin to "prosumers," blending former distinctions between experts and novices (VanHaitsma, 2015, p. 38), a markedly different approach to the suffering researcher so vividly described in the book Dust (Steedman, 2001).…”
Section: Relational Architecture In and From The Archivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not every exigence is rhetorical; for an exigence to be rhetorical, it must be open to modification or improvement through discourse. The definition of discourse, which initially meant only spoken and written language, has broadened thanks to rhetoric scholars in general and RGS scholars in particular, who have developed a more capacious understanding that accounts for all visual, multimodal, and embodied practices used to create meaning and modify situations (Arola & Wysocki, ; Blair, ; Finnegan, ). Consequently, we argue that the new call on the VA to acknowledge and serve LGBT veterans is a rhetorical exigence—a situation that is open to modification and improvement through written, oral, multimodal, and embodied rhetorics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%