1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf03374153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the use of plantation archaeology?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, researchers have previously considered the social and historical conditions out of which archaeology emerged in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries (Hinsley 2000;Meskell 1998;Silberman 1982), the nationalistic purposes to which archaeology has been put (Kohl and Fawcett 1995), and the potential uses of archaeological discoveries by non-specialist audiences (Potter 1991). Most archaeologists are keenly aware of the power of archaeological interpretations for shaping knowledge about the past, and of the power of objects to fix and even reify assumptions about social groups who lived in the past (Arens 1979;Deloria 1969;Thomas 2000).…”
Section: Archaeological Collections Management As Social Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, researchers have previously considered the social and historical conditions out of which archaeology emerged in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries (Hinsley 2000;Meskell 1998;Silberman 1982), the nationalistic purposes to which archaeology has been put (Kohl and Fawcett 1995), and the potential uses of archaeological discoveries by non-specialist audiences (Potter 1991). Most archaeologists are keenly aware of the power of archaeological interpretations for shaping knowledge about the past, and of the power of objects to fix and even reify assumptions about social groups who lived in the past (Arens 1979;Deloria 1969;Thomas 2000).…”
Section: Archaeological Collections Management As Social Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archaeologists largely sought to uncover material evidence of the harsh conditions of slavery as well as tangible proof of African cultural continuities (Agbe‐Davies , 414). Yet, the call for archaeologists to foreground race in their analyses signaled a radical shift in the scope and the aims of a nascent African Diaspora archaeology (Franklin and McKee ; Orser , ; Potter ). The 1990s and 2000s specifically marked an increased engagement with critical theory, critical race theory, and Black feminism, which ultimately yielded an interrogation of power in the archaeological study of the Black past (Agbe‐Davies , 415).…”
Section: The Rise Of African Diaspora Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This wave of critical thought and theorizing challenged those excavating historic Black sites to participate in self‐reflexivity, engage with descendant community members as equal partners in the production of knowledge, and to recognize race as an integral part of modern society (Leone et al. ; Mullins ; Orser , ; Potter ). Moreover, the application of critical theories of race, class, and gender more closely aligned the goals of African American archaeology with the political and intellectual aims of the study of the African Diaspora by closely linking the field with the aims of the racial vindicationist tradition (Mullins ).…”
Section: The Rise Of African Diaspora Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oral history project was a significant factor in these outreach efforts since it helped to open up lines of communication between researchers and the community. A growing number of archeologists are involving descendants in their research at various levels of engagement as commitment to deal responsibly with the profession's racial politics spreads (Epperson 2004;Franklin and Paynter 2010;LaRoche and Blakey 1997;McDavid 2002;McGuire 2008;Mullins 2007Mullins , 2008Orser 1998;Palus et al 2006;Potter 1991Potter , 1994Scham 2001;Singleton 1999 ed. ;Young 2004).…”
Section: Maria Franklinmentioning
confidence: 99%