2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-016-0448-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the use of shaping a tang? Tool use and hafting of tanged tools in the Aterian of Northern Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of multiple tanged artefacts, both in excavation and from surface surveys, alongside the use of Levallois technologies fit neatly with expressions of Middle Palaeolithic assemblages from western South Asia (Blinkhorn et al, 2015), as well as elsewhere in the Indian subcontinent, such as Jwalapuram 22 (Clarkson et al, 2012), that have been directly linked with expanding populations of modern humans. Critically, functional studies in other regions have illustrated how the production of tangs on lithic artefacts relates to hafting practices (Tomasso and Rots, 2018). While to date no comparable studies have been conducted for Palaeolithic artefacts in South Asia, the presence of multiple tanged artefacts at Sandhav may offer some of the earliest indices for hafting practices in the region, and is comparable to tanged artefacts reported from Late Pleistocene Middle Palaeolithic sites including Patne, Katoati, Jwalapuram, the Sagileru Valley, and Chamu (Blinkhorn 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The presence of multiple tanged artefacts, both in excavation and from surface surveys, alongside the use of Levallois technologies fit neatly with expressions of Middle Palaeolithic assemblages from western South Asia (Blinkhorn et al, 2015), as well as elsewhere in the Indian subcontinent, such as Jwalapuram 22 (Clarkson et al, 2012), that have been directly linked with expanding populations of modern humans. Critically, functional studies in other regions have illustrated how the production of tangs on lithic artefacts relates to hafting practices (Tomasso and Rots, 2018). While to date no comparable studies have been conducted for Palaeolithic artefacts in South Asia, the presence of multiple tanged artefacts at Sandhav may offer some of the earliest indices for hafting practices in the region, and is comparable to tanged artefacts reported from Late Pleistocene Middle Palaeolithic sites including Patne, Katoati, Jwalapuram, the Sagileru Valley, and Chamu (Blinkhorn 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Many ideas on the development of composite tool technologies are based on microscopic use-wear, macrofractures (6, 45), and the shape of tools (e.g., the presence of tangs, basal thinning). Yet the functional significance of such morphological features is not always clear (46). The exact hafting configurations and functioning of hafted tools are also debated (47,48), while variability in methods of hafting is almost completely unexplored (22,27,45,49).…”
Section: Procedural Complexity and Hafting Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there is growing evidence for hafted projectiles in South Africa of similar ages to other areas, such as Northern Africa [ 83 , 84 ] and the Near East [ 85 ]. Functional evidence for earlier hafted projectiles has been documented for Europe (e.g., [ 86 ]), even though one has to acknowledge the low frequency of identified projectiles per site in comparison to the tool frequency and assemblage size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%