What is the relationship between the recognition of emotions and core beliefs: Associations between the recognition of emotions in facial expressions and the maladaptive schemas in depressed patients

How Major Depressive Disorder Affects the Ability to Decode Multimodal Dynamic Emotional Stimuli

“…This result is consistent with other studies reporting a deficit in the recognition of static happy stimuli (Rubinow and Post, 1992;Surguladze et al, 2004;LeMoult et al, 2009;Csukly et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2014). Bias toward happiness may be due to anhedonia (Ribot, 1896) that is a loss of capacity to experience pleasure from activities and situations usually considered rewarding (e.g., social relations, sports, hobbies, and sexual activities).…”

“…On this evidence, many studies prove that depressed patients show a labeling (recognition) bias toward negative emotions. More specifically, such investigations reported contradictory results, showing that MDDs can be either faster and/or more accurate (Mandal and Bhattacharya, 1985;Gilboa-Schechtman et al, 2002;Surguladze et al, 2004;Csukly et al, 2010;Milders et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2012) or slower and/or less accurate (Zuroff and Colussy, 1986;Cooley and Nowicki, 1989;Cerroni et al, 2007;Gollan et al, 2008;Csukly et al, 2009;Douglas and Porter, 2010;Anderson et al, 2011;Watters and Williams, 2011;Aldinger et al, 2013) than HC subjects in decoding fear, anger, and, in particular, sadness.…”

Emotion recognition in depression: An investigation of performance and response confidence in adult female patients with depression

“…However, this relationship remains unclear. While some studies show positive, as well as negative, associations between psychopathology and recognition of negative emotion expressions like anger and sadness (Aldinger et al, 2013;Csukly et al, 2011;Gollan et al, 2010), at least one other study did not detect any relationship (Naranjo et al, 2011). To resolve these ambiguities, future research should examine moderating factors.…”

The Latent Factor Structure of Young's Early Maladaptive Schemas: Are Schemas Organized Into Domains?

“…In addition to the models described above, the set of models tested included the following: the five‐domain model based on Young's original theory (Young, ), a three‐domain model from a student sample (Schmidt, Joiner, Young, & Telch, ), a two‐domain and a three‐domain model from a sample of psychiatric outpatients and healthy controls (Mihaescu et al, ), a four‐domain model from a student sample (Cecero, Nelson, & Gillie, ), a three‐domain model from a student sample (Calvete, Estévez, Arroyabe, & Ruiz, ), and a four‐domain model from a sample of inpatients with depression (Csukly et al, ). If the tested model had originally investigated the factor structure of more or less than 15 schemas, the nonoverlapping schemas of the data‐generating and the tested models were omitted from the analyses.…”