1993
DOI: 10.21236/ada266509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the Radar Tracking 'Glint' Problem and Can It Be Solved

Abstract: 04_ Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division FOREWORDThe work described in this report was performed during the 1993 fiscal year as part of an effort to improve missile signal processing capabilities. This problem continues to be central to radar research programs and considerable effort has been expended within the last few decades in attempts to solve it.There seems to be a good deal of confusion about the glint problem in radar target tracking. Judging by the many requests for information that I have recei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phase center of the receiver is located at the origin than the CRLB, makes a better approximation of the measurement error. 18 Glint is a measurement inaccuracy that occurs when multiple unresolvable reflectors on a target interfere to produce highly variable angular estimates [34]. The use of bistatic radar measurements (as opposed to monostatic) was observed to reduce the problem [318, pp.…”
Section: A the Local Coordinate Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The phase center of the receiver is located at the origin than the CRLB, makes a better approximation of the measurement error. 18 Glint is a measurement inaccuracy that occurs when multiple unresolvable reflectors on a target interfere to produce highly variable angular estimates [34]. The use of bistatic radar measurements (as opposed to monostatic) was observed to reduce the problem [318, pp.…”
Section: A the Local Coordinate Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, assuming that the estimate errors are approximately Gaussian distributed, an upper and lower bounds for a 99% confidence region 33 of the NEES for a d x = 3 and N MC = 1 000 are approximately 0.9347 and 1.0678; for d x = 6, they are 0.9645 and 1.0361. 34 The definition of a consistent estimator based on the NEES in (59) differs slightly from the more commonly cited definition given in [17,Ch. 5.4], where an estimator x̂ is consistent if…”
Section: A Estimator Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The algorithmic approach to detect wire employed here may be described as glint tracking. While glint is known to be a problem in other radar tracking applications, 8,9 here it is selectively used as a source. To achieve real time through-put, fast processing will be required.…”
Section: High Performance Computing Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%