2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the physics behind the Larson mass–size relation?

Abstract: Different studies have reported a power-law mass-size relation M ∝ R q for ensembles of molecular clouds. In the case of nearby clouds, the index of the power-law q is close to 2. However, for clouds spread all over the Galaxy, indexes larger than 2 are reported. We show that indexes larger than 2 could be the result of line-of-sight superposition of emission that does not belong to the cloud itself. We found that a random factor of gas contamination, between 0.001% and 10% of the line-of-sight, allows to repr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we see a good correlation between these two quantities, the slopes for the relation derived under the two temperature assumptions varies significantly. The mass-size relation in the T H2CO approach follows M ∝ r 2.0±0.3 , close to the lines of constant column densities as would be expected from Larson's relations (e.g., Heyer et al 2009;Lombardi et al 2010;Ballesteros-Paredes et al 2019. In contrast to this, the mass-size relation in the T 20K approach follows a steeper relation of M ∝ r 3.0±0.2 , which is close to the line of constant density at 10 6 cm −3 .…”
Section: Fragmentation and Continuum Emissionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While we see a good correlation between these two quantities, the slopes for the relation derived under the two temperature assumptions varies significantly. The mass-size relation in the T H2CO approach follows M ∝ r 2.0±0.3 , close to the lines of constant column densities as would be expected from Larson's relations (e.g., Heyer et al 2009;Lombardi et al 2010;Ballesteros-Paredes et al 2019. In contrast to this, the mass-size relation in the T 20K approach follows a steeper relation of M ∝ r 3.0±0.2 , which is close to the line of constant density at 10 6 cm −3 .…”
Section: Fragmentation and Continuum Emissionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In the literature, mass-size relations with various exponents can be found. While some studies report relations close to the classical r −2.0 (e.g., Heyer et al 2009;Lombardi et al 2010;Ballesteros-Paredes et al 2019), steeper relations have been found as well. For example, Kainulainen et al (2011) found a mass-size relation with exponent 2.7 when sampling only the highest column density parts of their studied molecular clouds (those regions where the column density probability density functions leave the lognormal shape and rather flatten out).…”
Section: Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the literature, mass-size relations with various exponents can be found. While some studies report relations close to the classical r −2.0 (e.g., Heyer et al 2009;Lombardi et al 2010;Ballesteros-Paredes et al 2019), steeper relations have been found as well. For example, Kainulainen et al ( 2011) found a mass-size relation with exponent 2.7 when sampling only the highest column density parts of their studied molecular clouds (those regions where the column density probability density functions leave the lognormal shape and rather flatten out).…”
Section: Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Third, the average scatter in the calculated mean surface density in the molecular ring GMCs (42 M pc −2 ) is found to be 4.5 times higher than that (9 M pc −2 ) in the outer Galaxy GMCs. Random variations in the degree of cloud overlap could account for the larger dispersions measured for Σ GM C in the molecular ring compared to other regions of the Galaxy (e.g., Ballesteros-Paredes et al 2019). These considerations add to the surmise that surface density measurements made toward the molecular ring are much more susceptible to systematic biases that both increase the scatter in and the measured values of Σ GM C compared to other regions of the Galaxy.…”
Section: Nature Of the Radial Variation: A Metallicity Dependent Co X...mentioning
confidence: 99%