2017
DOI: 10.1111/joim.12695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the outcome in patients with acute leukaemia who survive severe acute graft‐versus‐host disease?

Abstract: HSCT patients who survive severe aGVHD have higher risk of developing extensive cGVHD, a higher NRM, a lower relapse probability, and lower LFS than other HSCT patients. This study is a platform for outcome analysis in patients treated with novel therapies for acute GVHD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are unfortunate yet expected complications after HCT. Patients who survived acute GVHD have an reduced risk of leukemic relapse (101). The graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect did not prevent relapse in this girl with high risk B-ALL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are unfortunate yet expected complications after HCT. Patients who survived acute GVHD have an reduced risk of leukemic relapse (101). The graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect did not prevent relapse in this girl with high risk B-ALL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Children have a relatively low risk of chronic GVHD (104,105). However, there is an increased risk of chronic GVHD in patients who survive acute GVHD (101). Children have a better outcome than adults after HCT and this is striking in patients with severe acute GVHD (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With our current protocol (corresponding to group 2), the survival of patients with steroid‐refractory acute GVHD was similar to that in all the patients who underwent HSCT at our center in the last 5 years. It should be noted that patients who survived severe acute GVHD, treated with conventional immunosuppressive therapy, have a significantly worse outcome than all other HSCT patients . In contrast, patients who were treated with DSCs for severe acute GVHD had much better survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,16 Not ideal, this therapy is associated with severe side effects, and in patients with acute GVHD of grade II or higher, durable response rates are dismal varying from 30% to 50%. [17][18][19] Outcomes in severe cases of acute GVHD are poor, leading to increased risk of chronic GVHD, increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and decreased overall survival (OS). 19 Given the incidence of acute GVHD and its highly debilitating consequences, efforts to better comprehend and abate this clinical syndrome are ongoing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19] Outcomes in severe cases of acute GVHD are poor, leading to increased risk of chronic GVHD, increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and decreased overall survival (OS). 19 Given the incidence of acute GVHD and its highly debilitating consequences, efforts to better comprehend and abate this clinical syndrome are ongoing. Although it is recognized that several advances in the realm of pathophysiology have been made by others, discussion of this topic is outside the scope of this review.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%