Abstract:The optimal compression-ventilation ratio is still unknown and the best tradeoff between oxygenation and organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is probably different for each patient and scenario. A discrepancy between what is recommended by the current guidelines and the 'real world' of cardiopulmonary resuscitation has resulted in a near flat survival rate from cardiac arrest in the past few years.
“…Changes to the procedure included the process for locating the pressure point for chest compressions and also a change in the ratio of chest compressions to mouth-to-mouth ventilations to 30:2 [4,5] in order to decrease interruptions in chest compressions and thereby provide more continuous coronary blood flow [4,6,7].…”
In this manikin setting, both hands-off time and the total number of chest compressions improved with basic life support performed according to the ERC guidelines of 2005.
“…Changes to the procedure included the process for locating the pressure point for chest compressions and also a change in the ratio of chest compressions to mouth-to-mouth ventilations to 30:2 [4,5] in order to decrease interruptions in chest compressions and thereby provide more continuous coronary blood flow [4,6,7].…”
In this manikin setting, both hands-off time and the total number of chest compressions improved with basic life support performed according to the ERC guidelines of 2005.
“…Studied interpretation of the available evidence [26,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] supports the contention that at least some ventilations should occur during resuscitative efforts from cardiac arrest. Acid-base balance and oxygenation are important factors in survival from states of profound shock [46][47][48].…”
Section: The Benefit Of Ventilationsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Several well established laboratories have previously demonstrated that chest compression only CPR can be as effective as chest compressions and rescue breathing during the first 6-12 min of cardiac arrest in animal models [38][39][40][41][42][43]. The persistence of an open airway in these models, allowing for ventilation produced by chest compressions alone or in conjunction with spontaneous gasping, may not reflect physiology in human resuscitation [26,[38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: No Ventilationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The optimal compression : ventilation ratio has not been defined, but is likely to be considerably greater compressions and fewer breaths than has been clinically practiced [26]. The need for pulmonary gas exchange during states of profound shock is reduced.…”
Section: Ventilations Without An Advanced Airwaymentioning
The fundamental hemodynamic principle of intrathoracic pressure defines cardio-cerebral-pulmonary interactions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Further research is essential to optimize these interactions during treatment of profound shock.
“…While many studies have been performed by different researchers to investigate various hemodynamic and mechanical aspects of the application of chest compressions during CPR [2,7,10,11,14,15,17,[19][20][21][22]25], as of now comparatively few studies have investigated the conditions required to achieve optimum CC performance during CPR [4,5,8,12,24,26]. Most of the previous work in this area has focused on determining the best CC to ventilation ratio during CPR in infants [5,26] and adults [4,12,24]. The optimal CC depth for children was also studied experimentally by Braga et al [8] using computer tomography.…”
The aim of this study is to determine the conditions necessary to achieve optimum chest compression (CC) performance during constant peak displacement cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This was accomplished by first performing a sensitivity analysis on a theoretical constant peak displacement CPR CC model to identify the parameters with the highest sensitivity. Next, the most sensitive parameters were then optimized for net sternum-to-spine compression depth, using a two-variable non-linear least squares method. The theoretical CC model was found to be most sensitive to: thoracic stiffness, maximum sternal displacement, CC rate, and back support stiffness. Based on a two-variable, non-linear least squares analysis to optimize the model for the net sternum-to-spine compression depth during constant peak displacement CPR, it was found that the optimum ranges for the CC rate and back support stiffness are between 40-120 cpm and 241.0-1198.5 Ncm⁻¹, respectively. Clinically, this suggests that current ERC guidelines for the CC rate during peak displacement CPR are appropriate; however, practitioners should be aware that the stiffness of the back support surfaces found in many hospitals may be sub-optimal and should consider using a backboard or a concrete floor to enhance CPR effectiveness.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.