2014
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2014.940573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?

Abstract: BackgroundSurgeon-dependent factors such as optimal implant alignment are thought to play a significant role in outcome following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Exact definitions and references for optimal alignment are, however, still being debated. This overview of the literature describes different definitions of component alignment following primary TKA for (1) tibiofemoral alignment in the AP plane, (2) tibial and femoral component placement in the AP plane, (3) tibial and femoral component placem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
169
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
8
169
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The radiological definition of “normally” aligned TKA knees is debated (Abdel et al 2014, Gromov et al 2014), but most papers on implant survival and radiological alignment have used some deviation from the mechanical or anatomical coronal axis for definement of malalignment. Several studies have used a deviation of 3° from a neutral alignment as a threshold for what is acceptable for good long-term results (Jeffery et al 1991, Ritter et al 1994 and 2011, Berend et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiological definition of “normally” aligned TKA knees is debated (Abdel et al 2014, Gromov et al 2014), but most papers on implant survival and radiological alignment have used some deviation from the mechanical or anatomical coronal axis for definement of malalignment. Several studies have used a deviation of 3° from a neutral alignment as a threshold for what is acceptable for good long-term results (Jeffery et al 1991, Ritter et al 1994 and 2011, Berend et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometric differences between these axes have been compared in various studies (Berger et al, 1993; Eckhoff et al, 2001; Most et al, 2004; Victor et al, 2009). However, the differences of femoral condylar motion measured using these axes are still not well defined during dynamic motions of the knee (Gromov et al, 2014; Victor, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimal sagittal alignment of the posterior tibial slope is between 0°and 7°, while optimal placement of the femoral component in the sagittal plane should be within 0°-3°of flexion [9]. In this regard, the current study resulted in one outlier for the tibia component on the sagittal plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%