2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/708/2/1716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is the Numerically Converged Amplitude of Magnetohydrodynamics Turbulence in Stratified Shearing Boxes?

Abstract: We study the properties of the turbulence driven by the magnetorotational instability (MRI) in a stratified shearing box with outflow boundary conditions and an equation of state determined by self-consistent dissipation and radiation losses. A series of simulations with increasing resolution are performed within a fixed computational box. We achieve numerical convergence with respect to radial and azimuthal resolution. As vertical resolution is improved, the ratio of stress to pressure increases slowly, but t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
116
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(42 reference statements)
25
116
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This happens on 10 orbit timescale and is consistent with a simple α-Ω dynamo (Brandenburg et al 1995;Stone et al 1996;Hirose et a. 2006;Guan 2009;Shi et a. 2010;Gressel2010;Davis et al 2010;Simon et al 2010).…”
Section: Radial Advection Of Fieldsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This happens on 10 orbit timescale and is consistent with a simple α-Ω dynamo (Brandenburg et al 1995;Stone et al 1996;Hirose et a. 2006;Guan 2009;Shi et a. 2010;Gressel2010;Davis et al 2010;Simon et al 2010).…”
Section: Radial Advection Of Fieldsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The result that stress increases with net magnetic flux has also been confirmed in localized regions of global simulations (Sorathia, Reynolds & Armitage 2010). Adding in vertical gravity in stratified simulations enables convergence of the turbulent stresses even without net magnetic flux and explicit viscosity and resistivity (Shi, Krolik & Hirose 2010;Davis, Stone & Pessah 2010). A major difference between unstratified and stratified shearing box simulations is that gravity allows for magnetic buoyancy, and this is clearly playing a role as alternating signs of azimuthal field continually develop in a dynamo within the MRI turbulence and rise outward (Brandenburg et al 1995).…”
Section: Shearing Box Simulations Of Mri Turbulencementioning
confidence: 58%
“…The reason of this butterfly structure and its role for the MRI is still under discussion. Recent studies show the connection to the MHD dynamo (Gressel 2010) and magnetic buoyancy (Shi et al 2010). …”
Section: Butterfly Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideal MHD simulations including stratification found at least convergence for zero-net flux local simulations (Davis et al 2010;Flaig et al 2010). Here, the vertical resolution plays the key role for the convergence (Shi et al 2010). Despite the simplicity of box simulations and their interesting results obtained over the last years, the study of radial extended structures are very restricted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%