2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the influence of FDI and international people flows on environment and growth in OECD countries? A panel study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, for example, Pazienza [30] in a study for 30 countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), showed the existence of negative relationships that characterize the technique (−0.0848), the scale (−0.0036), and the cumulative effects (−0.0044) of the FDI on CO 2 emissions. Likewise, [31] supported the hypothesis of the environmental Kuznets curve in the short term, while in the long term there are some variations in a similar sample of OECD countries. In a more recent version of the same study by Pazienza [32], the outcome revealed that the negative impact of the FDI on the emission of CO 2 , decreases as the scale of its inflow increases, leading to a reconsideration of the potential effects on the CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Brief Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Thus, for example, Pazienza [30] in a study for 30 countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), showed the existence of negative relationships that characterize the technique (−0.0848), the scale (−0.0036), and the cumulative effects (−0.0044) of the FDI on CO 2 emissions. Likewise, [31] supported the hypothesis of the environmental Kuznets curve in the short term, while in the long term there are some variations in a similar sample of OECD countries. In a more recent version of the same study by Pazienza [32], the outcome revealed that the negative impact of the FDI on the emission of CO 2 , decreases as the scale of its inflow increases, leading to a reconsideration of the potential effects on the CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Brief Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…With an FMOLS approach, [ 72 ] studied 22 members of OECD, during 1971–2000 and found support for the EKC hypothesis, a similar result was found by [ 73 , 74 ]), and besides the research described in [ 73 ] tested for causality. The results point to evidence of a two-dimensional relationship between emissions and GDP, investigating 78 countries, 26 OECD members with high income and 52 developing economies, applying an OLS panel estimation for the period of 1980–2010, but they do not support the EKC hypothesis for any of the countries in the sample [ 75 ], while [ 76 ] only supports the EKC for the short term, with a pooled OLS (POLS) and DOLS approach for 36 OECD countries during 2000–2017.…”
Section: Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, globalisation is seen to enable countries to achieve environmental improvements [ 7 ], while on the other hand, as much of the literature recognises, globalisation is viewed as a driving force of economic growth [ 8 ] which could, consequently, be a driver of environmental degradation [ 7 , 9 ]. The same is noted for FDI, as it increases economic growth [ 10 , 11 ], but its negative effects on the environment are observed [ 12 , 13 ] as well. These negative effects of globalisation and FDI are external factors which have an adverse effect, negative externalities, on the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%