2020
DOI: 10.7189/jogh.10.021104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the evidence for transmission of COVID-19 by children in schools? A living systematic review

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
1
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
29
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There was some evidence of robust spread of SARS-CoV-2 in secondary and high-schools (eg, high seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among high-school students in northern France [ 83 ], and an outbreak in an Israel high-school [ 13 ]), while the spread seemed to be more limited in primary schools [ 12 , 14 , 15 , 82 , 88 - 91 ]. Xu et al conducted a living systematic review and reported that the SARS-CoV-2 infection attack rates were 0.15% (95% CI = 0%-0.93%) among students and 0.70% (95% CI = 0%-3.56%) among school staff, respectively [ 110 ]. These findings are largely consistent with the primary finding of the present study that children are not as susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection as adults, and while children are known to be “super spreaders” for influenza [ 111 ] and measles viruses [ 112 ], they play only a limited role in SARS-CoV-2 transmission in various settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was some evidence of robust spread of SARS-CoV-2 in secondary and high-schools (eg, high seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among high-school students in northern France [ 83 ], and an outbreak in an Israel high-school [ 13 ]), while the spread seemed to be more limited in primary schools [ 12 , 14 , 15 , 82 , 88 - 91 ]. Xu et al conducted a living systematic review and reported that the SARS-CoV-2 infection attack rates were 0.15% (95% CI = 0%-0.93%) among students and 0.70% (95% CI = 0%-3.56%) among school staff, respectively [ 110 ]. These findings are largely consistent with the primary finding of the present study that children are not as susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection as adults, and while children are known to be “super spreaders” for influenza [ 111 ] and measles viruses [ 112 ], they play only a limited role in SARS-CoV-2 transmission in various settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other common aspects of COVID-19 in the pediatric popu lation, highlighted by the available literature, include fecal shedding of the virus in children, 44,46 imaging findings, 21,35,51,67 COVID-19 in neonates and infa nts, 27,29,42,52,54,66 Kawasaki-like disease in pediatric patients, 24 laboratory abnormalities in various parameters, 60 effects of COVID-19 on the survival of children with malignancies, 69 and schooling during COVID-19. 47,70,71 Our study has several limitations. First, by virtue of this bibliometric review, the authors have attempted to give a glimpse of the highest level of evidence (Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis) published on COVID-19 in the pediatric population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A systematic review of five cohort studies comprising 3,345 contacts with 18 transmissions in schools resulted in an overall attack rate of 0.08% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00-0.86%). 14 In Ireland, of 1,001 child contacts of six confirmed index cases, there were no secondary cases of COVID-19, suggesting that schools were not drivers of transmission. 15 In Germany, the reopening of schools in May 2020 showed that child-to-child transmission in schools/childcare facilities was very uncommon.…”
Section: Empirical Findings In Mitigating Outbreaksmentioning
confidence: 99%