2013
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the evidence for systemic effects of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents, and should we be concerned?

Abstract: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy has revolutionised the treatment of retinal disease, and appears to be very safe. Nevertheless, there are several lines of evidence that imply that small doses of these agents could potentially have a systemic effect. The clinical significance of these systemic effects remains unclear, but further study is indicated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prolonged suppression of plasma VEGF levels resulting from serial intravitreal anti-VEGF injections might, therefore, raise concern for unwanted systemic effects (Avery 2014). Thus, this study was to prospectively evaluate the effects on systemic VEGF levels after an intravitreal injection of aflibercept or ranibizumab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prolonged suppression of plasma VEGF levels resulting from serial intravitreal anti-VEGF injections might, therefore, raise concern for unwanted systemic effects (Avery 2014). Thus, this study was to prospectively evaluate the effects on systemic VEGF levels after an intravitreal injection of aflibercept or ranibizumab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment is generally believed to be systemically safe, it has been difficult to determine whether anti-VEGF might increase the risk of stroke, arteriothrombotic events, or cardiovascular events because studies have been underpowered and patients with DME may be at increased risk of these events regardless of treatment. 46 However, the majority of panelists agreed that they typically would likely consider a change in therapy if a patient being treated with anti-VEGF had a recent stroke or cardiovascular event. In a recent meta-analysis that pooled systemic safety data from patients treated with ranibizumab 0.5 mg or aflibercept in clinical studies, the risk of cerebrovascular accidents and vascular deaths was significantly higher in patients treated monthly for 2 years with anti-VEGF injections than in patients treated with sham, 47 suggesting that frequent anti-VEGF injections over the long term may increase the risk of serious systemic adverse events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, VEGF is one of the most potent cytokines and has an essential role in angiogenesis, giving it an important role in the normal development of the brain, lung, and kidney tissue in children, 2 as well as in maintaining normal organ function in adults. [3][4][5] However, the effects of intraocular administration of anti-VEGF drugs on systemic levels remain controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] However, the effects of intraocular administration of anti-VEGF drugs on systemic levels remain controversial. 1 Different anti-VEGF agents also have different molecular structures, different transmissibility across the blood-retinal barrier, and different systemic half-lives, so could potentially have different effects on systemic VEGF levels. 1,[6][7][8][9] Ranibizumab is a recombinantly produced, humanized monoclonal antibody fragment (Fab) designed for intraocular use that binds and inhibits all biologically active isoforms of human VEGF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation