1987
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(87)90424-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the cosmion?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not require the Z interactions with the SM to yield the correct thermal relic density for χ as the DM relic density may well be of asymmetric origin. In particular the mass range required to fit DAMA and CoGeNT is natural in models of asymmetric DM (ADM), where the observed cosmological DM energy density is realised for m χ ∼ 1 − 10 GeV [37,38]. Moreover the ADM scenario avoids the otherwise significant constraints from annihilation of light DM, such as from the Sun [39,40].…”
Section: Limits On the Mixing Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not require the Z interactions with the SM to yield the correct thermal relic density for χ as the DM relic density may well be of asymmetric origin. In particular the mass range required to fit DAMA and CoGeNT is natural in models of asymmetric DM (ADM), where the observed cosmological DM energy density is realised for m χ ∼ 1 − 10 GeV [37,38]. Moreover the ADM scenario avoids the otherwise significant constraints from annihilation of light DM, such as from the Sun [39,40].…”
Section: Limits On the Mixing Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these models the DM density is set by its particleanti-particle asymmetry, similar to the baryon asymmetry, rather than by its annihilation cross-section. While the idea that DM may carry a particle asymmetry has existed in the literature for a long time [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], it has only been relatively recently that robust classes of models based on higher dimension operators were introduced [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the millimeter unit for the displacement since the detectors at the LHC can roughly resolve the displaced vertex up to a millimeter. Assuming that the LOSP decays through only one dominant coupling 1=M ijk that does not involve the third generation, 2 we list the three-body LOSP decays for each …”
Section: Prompt Versus Displaced Vertex Losp Decays At Collidersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The third generation complicates the general discussion because the top-quark mass cannot be ignored and the thirdgeneration squarks generally have a large mixing. We leave the third-generation-specific scenarios for future work.…”
Section: Prompt Versus Displaced Vertex Losp Decays At Collidersmentioning
confidence: 99%