What Is the Best Treatment of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma? An Individual Patient Data Network Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Purpose The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) or induction chemotherapy (IC) in the treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma is controversial. The individual patient data from the Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Nasopharynx Carcinoma database were used to compare all available treatments. Methods All randomized trials of radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy in nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma were considered. Overall, 20 trials and 5,144 patients were included. Treatments were grouped into seven categories: RT alone (RT), IC followed by RT (IC-RT), RT followed by AC (RT-AC), IC followed by RT followed by AC (IC-RT-AC), concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), IC followed by CRT (IC-CRT), and CRT followed by AC (CRT-AC). P-score was used to rank the treatments. Fixed- and random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis models were applied. Results The three treatments with the highest probability of benefit on overall survival (OS) were CRT-AC, followed by CRT and IC-CRT, with respective hazard ratios (HRs [95% CIs]) compared with RT alone of 0.65 (0.56 to 0.75), 0.77 (0.64 to 0.92), and 0.81 (0.63 to 1.04). HRs (95% CIs) of CRT-AC compared with CRT for OS, progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control, and distant control (DC) were, respectively, 0.85 (0.68 to 1.05), 0.81 (0.66 to 0.98), 0.70 (0.48 to 1.02), and 0.87 (0.61 to 1.25). IC-CRT ranked second for PFS and the best for DC. CRT never ranked first. HRs of CRT compared with IC-CRT for OS, PFS, locoregional control, and DC were, respectively, 0.95 (0.72 to 1.25), 1.13 (0.88 to 1.46), 1.05 (0.70 to 1.59), and 1.55 (0.94 to 2.56). Regimens with more chemotherapy were associated with increased risk of acute toxicity. Conclusion The addition of AC to CRT achieved the highest survival benefit and consistent improvement for all end points. The addition of IC to CRT achieved the highest effect on DC.

The calcium‐sensing receptor: A novel target for treatment and prophylaxis of neratinib‐induced diarrhea

“…Targeted therapies such as TKIs are showing promising clinical efficacy in cancer patients, however, the side effects of the therapy can in some cases adverse symptoms that may lead to the cessation of treatment . A very common adverse effect from chemotherapy or certain TKIs, such as neratinib, is diarrhea which can lead to dramatic loss of fluids and electrolytes, and under severe conditions also lead to malabsorption of nutrients due to the accelerated transit time along the intestine …”

A multicenter, phase 3, randomized trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: 10‐year outcomes for efficacy and toxicity

“…The analyses by the MAC‐NPC Collaborative Group favored additional chemotherapy . The comparisons of concurrent chemotherapy were more heterogeneous: a review of individual trials showed that only the trial using concurrent cisplatin for patients largely with stage II disease treated by 2‐dimensional RT achieved significant benefits for both PFS and OS .…”

Resolve conflicting rankings of outcomes in network meta‐analysis: Partial ordering of treatments

“…Outcomes were overall survival, progression‐free survival, locoregional control, and distant control. For each outcome, the authors ranked the treatments by P scores, here given in Table . P scores are numbers between 0 and 1, with mean 0.5, representing the rank of a treatment within the given range of competing treatments, where 1 means theoretically best and 0 means worst .…”