2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4534(01)00288-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the best gate for vortex entry into type-II superconductor?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to linear stability analysis, previous work has also used the time-dependent theory to estimate the entry field [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] . An advantage of using the timedependent theory, is the ability to explore rough geometries.…”
Section: A Agreement With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to linear stability analysis, previous work has also used the time-dependent theory to estimate the entry field [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] . An advantage of using the timedependent theory, is the ability to explore rough geometries.…”
Section: A Agreement With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often real systems have rough surfaces and interior defects that don't match this geometry. The role of surface roughness on H sh in two dimensional geometries with surface defects has been studied extensively within Ginzburg-Landau theory [15][16][17][18] . There has also been considerable effort to simulate vortex nucleation and subsequent dynamics for more complicated domains within time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) theory [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonuniformity may come from the Meissner (screening) effect which is important in wide films/bridges with width w > λ 2 /d (λ is the London penetration depth, d is the thickness of the film/bridge). In narrow films/bridges (w λ 2 /d) spatially nonuniform current distribution may arise due to the current crowding effect near edge/surface irregularities [12][13][14] or due to specific geometry [15]. We demonstrate, that for not very wide bridges and currents close to I c , the delay in the voltage response is mainly connected with the entrance of the first vortex and qualitatively resembles the time delay of quasi-onedimensional (1D) bridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Note that all previous theories predicted a strong temperature dependence of t d near T c [2,3] due to the coefficient a(T ) in Eq. (13). In Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use Fourier's law to determine the coefficients a, c and e in Eqs. ( 7) and (10). For 0 ≤ r ≤ D, Q = P GB /D 2 , so that:…”
Section: −κ Nb3snmentioning
confidence: 99%