2022
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the best anthropometry index to evaluate the risk of metabolic abnormalities in Chinese adults?

Abstract: Aims Obesity, defined by body mass index (BMI), is a heterogeneous condition with varying metabolic manifestations, and the best index for predicting metabolic abnormalities remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the most suitable anthropometry index for predicting metabolic abnormalities in Chinese adults. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted using the data obtained from 9517 Chinese adults who underwent physical examination, bioelectrical impedance analysis, and laboratory examinations between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of clinical importance, a WHtR of 0.5 is emerging as a cut-off for metabolic abnormalities among different ethnicities and even in nonoverweight/obese adults [36]. The value of a WHtR of 0.5 as a universal cut-off for screening for metabolic abnormalities is confirmed by the meta-analysis by Ashwell et al [37], and large epidemiological studies in several countries [38,39]. It has been hypothesized that WHtR is a more reliable predictor than WC alone given the genetic advantage of height on cardiometabolic risk whether it be due to genetics alone or the effect of intrauterine exposures during critical period of growth and development [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Of clinical importance, a WHtR of 0.5 is emerging as a cut-off for metabolic abnormalities among different ethnicities and even in nonoverweight/obese adults [36]. The value of a WHtR of 0.5 as a universal cut-off for screening for metabolic abnormalities is confirmed by the meta-analysis by Ashwell et al [37], and large epidemiological studies in several countries [38,39]. It has been hypothesized that WHtR is a more reliable predictor than WC alone given the genetic advantage of height on cardiometabolic risk whether it be due to genetics alone or the effect of intrauterine exposures during critical period of growth and development [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…And the cut‐off values of all these variables were obtained by ROC curves, with the values reaching the maximum AUC (Youden's index = sensitivity + specificity − 1). As described by Hu et al, 21 the ROC curve and Youden's index were also calculated to identify the best predictor of metabolic abnormalities in Chinese adults. The cut‐off values were as follows: CRP ≥ 95 mg/dL, white blood cell count (WBC) ≥ 16.5 × 10 9 L, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 10, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 61.5 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥ 43.5 U/L, albumin (ALB) < 30 g/L, glucose (GLU) ≥ 9 mmol/L, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) > 20 mg/dL, calcium (CA) ≥ 2 mmol/L, high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) ≥ 0.7 mmol/L, pancreatic inflammation (PI) (yes vs. no), pancreatic necrosis (PN) (yes vs. no), and extrapancreatic complications (yes vs. no).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%