1980
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.1980.tb01028.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is Participation? A Review of the Literature and Some Methodological Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this situation, workers expressed a great many ambivalent and negative sentiments about their work. This lack of increased worker participation in high technology settings may also provide support for Loveridge's contention that worker participation is a fleeting and partial occurrence at the workplace, even under the best of circumstances [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In this situation, workers expressed a great many ambivalent and negative sentiments about their work. This lack of increased worker participation in high technology settings may also provide support for Loveridge's contention that worker participation is a fleeting and partial occurrence at the workplace, even under the best of circumstances [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…What conditions are necessary, then, for participation to be successful? Loveridge [12] used Walker's analysis, which argues that there are two elements to workers' participation (see Figure 1):…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Loveridge (1980) points out, Walker is working within the tradition of the contingency theorist where "potential for participation arises out of structural conditions which facilitate or impede labour-management interaction, influence and information exchange in conditions of openness and trust, and propensity to participate is defined in terms of the ability (knowledge and skills) of the actors to take part in managerial decision-making and their willingness to do so" (p.298). The contingency perspective is related to a "logic of efficiency" (Marchington and Loveridge, 1983, p.73) in that for any participation scheme to be acceptable to management it must Walker's model is relatively straightforward and clear but, Loveridge (1980) considers, may oversimplify the complexity of the interaction between structure and belief, potential and propensity:…”
Section: Determinants Of Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If many decisions are taken outside, this limits the potential for workers' involvement in such decisions. Loveridge (1980, p.302) While agreeing with this, Loveridge (1980) claims that nonetheless, it is clear that "the design of certain forms of plant and machinery sets limits to the range of associated tasks, and to the knowledge, skills and other inputs that go into them" (p.303). Equally, the technical system will affect the social system, the extent to which people work in groups or separately.…”
Section: (I) Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%