2005
DOI: 10.1080/10807030500257770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is Meant by “95% of Species”? An Argument for the Inclusion of Rapid Tolerance Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With increasing numbers of new and untested chemical compounds reaching the environment, there is an urgent need for more rapid ecotoxicology approaches than the traditional singlespecies tolerance tests (5,6). The application of high-throughput sequencing and qPCR technologies used in this study evaluated the sensitivity of more than 1,700 species, across 266 families, from 39 separate phyla.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With increasing numbers of new and untested chemical compounds reaching the environment, there is an urgent need for more rapid ecotoxicology approaches than the traditional singlespecies tolerance tests (5,6). The application of high-throughput sequencing and qPCR technologies used in this study evaluated the sensitivity of more than 1,700 species, across 266 families, from 39 separate phyla.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The confidence surrounding five to 10 model organisms accurately representing the sensitivity of an ecosystem is also questionable (5,6). Further, the selection criterion of model organisms has resulted in a bias toward temperate and Northern Hemisphere species, to the exclusion of rare and often sensitive species (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However Kefford et al (2005) have argued that it is more appropriate to use data for more species which may be derived using less precise techniques. The use of estimates of toxicity data generated using models, such as that proposed in this study, to derive WQGs is consistent with the use of species sensitivity distributions and the argument of Kefford et al (2005). In addition, estimates of toxicities generated by QSARs, are currently used to derive WQGs (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sample of species in the SSD is an unbiased sample of the communities for which conclusions will be drawn [4]. This assumption would appear to be rarely met in the conventional use of SSDs [6]. The number of species with sensitivity data included in the SSD is adequate [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%