2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3204-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is in it for Me? Middle Manager Behavioral Integrity and Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
31
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gerhart, Wright, and McMahan () questioned the reliability and validity of HRM research in which independent and dependent variables were derived from subjective measures and a single respondent/source. To circumvent this common source/common method problem, the independent (HRFLX L2MC) and dependent variables (firm financial performance) used to test this study's cross‐level moderation hypotheses were derived from data obtained from two distinct and independent sources (see Footnote 3; Way et al, in press). Accurate, objective firm‐level financial data were not available in this current study .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gerhart, Wright, and McMahan () questioned the reliability and validity of HRM research in which independent and dependent variables were derived from subjective measures and a single respondent/source. To circumvent this common source/common method problem, the independent (HRFLX L2MC) and dependent variables (firm financial performance) used to test this study's cross‐level moderation hypotheses were derived from data obtained from two distinct and independent sources (see Footnote 3; Way et al, in press). Accurate, objective firm‐level financial data were not available in this current study .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As outlined below, to avoid common source/method concerns (Way, Simons, Leroy, & Tuleja, in press), the current study's firm‐level (level 1) variables were derived from data obtained from one of three independent and distinct sources (also see Footnote 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response options ranged from 1 ( strongly disagree ) to 7 ( strongly agree ). In addition, each item included in our surveys was translated into Chinese by this article’s first and the third authors following the back-translation procedure (see Way et al, in press). In this iterative process, the two translators individually translated each item (from English to Chinese) and then compared notes with each other over multiple revisions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current research focused on learning if older terminology in current performance review documents is a barrier toward organizational leaders measuring OCBs during formal performance evaluations as compared to the newer terminology used by current researchers to define OCBs and measure employee performance.Organizational leaders must take note that employee retention depends upon providing recognition and rewards for a job well done(Ahn et al, 2018;Sguera et al, 2018;Tourigny et al, 2019). While most employees accept words of appreciation, such as "thank you," or "nice job," many people desire status, title, or monetary rewards(Conzelmann, 2020;Martí-Vilar et al, 2019;Way et al, 2018). Compensation and benefits include incentive strategies for performance improvement and organizational success.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%