What is important, what needs treating? How GPs perceive older patients’ multiple health problems: a mixed method research study

Abstract

BackgroundGPs increasingly deal with multiple health problems of their older patients. They have to apply a hierarchical management approach that considers priorities to balance competing needs for treatment. Yet, the practice of setting individual priorities in older patients is largely unexplored. This paper analyses the GPs’ perceptions on important and unimportant health problems and how these affect their treatment.MethodsGPs appraised the importance of health problems for a purposive sample of their older patients in semi-structured interviews. Prior to the interviews, the GPs had received a list of their patients’ health problems resulting from a geriatric assessment and were asked to rate the importance of each identified problem. In the interviews the GPs subsequently explained why they considered certain health problems important or not and how this affected treatment. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis and quantitative methods.ResultsThe problems GPs perceive as important are those that are medical and require active treatment or monitoring, or that induce empathy or awareness but cannot be assisted further. Unimportant problems are those that are well managed problems and need no further attention as well as age-related conditions or functional disabilities that provoke fatalism, or those considered outside the GPs’ responsibility. Statements of professional actions are closely linked to explanations of important problems and relate to physical problems rather than functional and social patient issues.ConclusionsGPs tend to prioritise treatable clinical conditions. Treatment approaches are, however, vague or missing for complex chronic illnesses and disabilities. Here, patient empowerment strategies are of value and need to be developed and implemented. The professional concepts of ageing and disability should not impede but rather foster treatment and care. To this end, GPs need to be able to delegate care to a functioning primary care team.Trial RegistrationGerman Trial Register (DRKS): 00000792

Reasons for disagreement regarding illnesses between older patients with multimorbidity and their GPs – a qualitative study

“…Patients prioritized symptomatic conditions such as pain, depression or breathing problems more than their providers [ 29 ]. Other studies also showed differences between older patients and their general practitioners regarding prioritization [ 30 – 32 ].…”

Do People with Disabilities Have Difficulty Finding a Family Physician?

“…The literature is unanimous that physicians are inadequately prepared to deal with disabled patients and with disability issues in practice [ 16 , 39 , 41 , 42 ]. As an example, Junius-Walker and colleagues [ 24 ] found that physicians were ill-disposed toward problems associated with disability, particularly those to which there is no immediate medical solution. Many disability-related problems provoked a fatalistic attitude in the attending GP, rather than a constructive problem-solving approach [ 7 ].…”

“…Although only 6% of the caseload, these patients consume 33% of a primary care practice’s resources [ 22 ]. Research on how people with disabilities are perceived by family physicians shows that doctors perceive them to be more challenging [ 23 , 24 ]. Physicians virtually unanimously report that disabled patients take more time and are more complex [ 25 ].…”

Patients, caregivers and health‐care professionals’ experience with an interdisciplinary intervention for people with multimorbidity in primary care: A qualitative study

“…A growing number of qualitative studies have explored the experience of patients with multimorbidity . There have also been numerous studies of the experiences and challenges of health‐care providers of patients with multimorbidity . These articles were mainly interested in the experiences of people aged 65 and over, suffering from multiple chronic diseases, followed in primary care (usual care).…”