2018
DOI: 10.15420/cfr.2018:7:2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is Heart Failure with Mid-range Ejection Fraction? A New Subgroup of Patients with Heart Failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, even from a prognostic viewpoint, patients with HFmrEF have been reported to show an "intermediate" behavior between HFrEF and HFpEF patients (21,26,31). Eventually, differently from the "older sibling child", it has been shown that HFmrEF patients are usually undertreated with the HF disease modifier drugs, namely angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors Adding further complexity to the HFmrEF clinical scenario, it is still debated whether the HFmrEF should be considered as a real clinical entity or just as a transition step of the dynamic functional and structural evolution of the continuous HF spectrum (24,33,34). However, another viewpoint, actually the prevalent one, distinguishes those HFmrEF patients who recovered from a depressed systolic function (rec-HFmrEF) from those who never experienced a EF lower than 40% (de novo HFmrEF).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, even from a prognostic viewpoint, patients with HFmrEF have been reported to show an "intermediate" behavior between HFrEF and HFpEF patients (21,26,31). Eventually, differently from the "older sibling child", it has been shown that HFmrEF patients are usually undertreated with the HF disease modifier drugs, namely angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors Adding further complexity to the HFmrEF clinical scenario, it is still debated whether the HFmrEF should be considered as a real clinical entity or just as a transition step of the dynamic functional and structural evolution of the continuous HF spectrum (24,33,34). However, another viewpoint, actually the prevalent one, distinguishes those HFmrEF patients who recovered from a depressed systolic function (rec-HFmrEF) from those who never experienced a EF lower than 40% (de novo HFmrEF).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative inefficiency of components of GDMT in HFpEF and HFmrEF phenotypes might have reduced the statistical power of GDMT-HFrEF relationship relative to the whole group. It should also be kept in mind that the study did not consider de novo GDMT, rather made a snapshot prevalence of GDMT; hence, incident GDMT might have yielded positive outcomes (43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50). Furthermore, the duration of GDMT might not be sufficient to yield prognostic benefit in 1 year, even in incident GDMT cases, and might have already yielded positive outcomes in prevalent GDMT cases (particularly those enrolled as patients with CHF were those who survived via already initiated GDMT).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to HFpEF and HFrEF, there is a relative paucity in literature discussing the phenotype of HFmrEF, and as such, this condition has often been referred to as the “middle child” in the HF family. The pathophysiology of HFmrEF, which accounts for ~10–20% of all HF patients (Nadar and Tariq, 2018), is largely unknown. Current evidence indicates that HFmrEF may be the outcome of a progressive worsening in LV function in HFpEF patients, most notably observed in those with concomitant coronary artery disease, which is associated with a deterioration in LVEF (Lam and Solomon, 2014).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Hfmrefmentioning
confidence: 99%