2019
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is Equus? Reconciling Taxonomy and Phylogenetic Analyses

Abstract: Interest in the origin and evolution of Equus dates back to over a century, but there is still no consensus on the definition of the genus or its phylogenetic position. We review the placement of Equus within several phylogenetic frameworks and present a phylogenetic analysis of derived Equini, including taxa referred to Equus, Haringtonhippus, Dinohippus, Astrohippus, Hippidion, and Boreohippidion. A new, morphology-based phylogenetic tree was used as an initial hypothesis for discussing what taxa Equus encom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(150 reference statements)
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, most scholars agree that North American E. simplicidens can be identified as the oldest species of genus Equus (Skinner and Hibbard, 1972;Azzaroli, 1992Azzaroli, , 2000Azzaroli, , 2002Azzaroli and Voorhies, 1993;Alberdi et al, 1998;Palombo and Alberdi, 2017;Bernor et al, 2018Bernor et al, , 2019Rook et al, 2019;Cirilli et al, 2020a,b); this hypothesis has also been supported by some recent paleogenomic analyses (Orlando et al, 2013;Vilstrup et al, 2013). Nevertheless, this hypothesis is not shared by some scholars, which prefer to identify the North American species into the genus Plesippus (Matthew, 1924;Gazin, 1936), and the Eurasian and African species into Allohippus (Kretzoi, 1938;Gromova, 1949); in their opinion, the genus Equus should be recognized as younger than 1 Ma (Eisenmann and Baylac, 2000;Eisenmann and Deng, 2005;Barrón-Ortiz et al, 2019). In this work, we consider the North American and Eurasian fossil species as being members of the genus Equus, following Skinner and Hibbard (1972), Azzaroli (1992Azzaroli ( , 2000Azzaroli ( , 2002, Azzaroli and Voorhies (1993), Alberdi et al (1998), Vilstrup et al (2013), Orlando et al (2013), Palombo and Alberdi (2017), Cantalapiedra et al (2017), Bernor et al (2018Bernor et al ( , 2019, Rook et al (2019), and Cirilli et al (2020a,b).…”
Section: Present Background Of the Genus Equus In The Old World Durinmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Historically, most scholars agree that North American E. simplicidens can be identified as the oldest species of genus Equus (Skinner and Hibbard, 1972;Azzaroli, 1992Azzaroli, , 2000Azzaroli, , 2002Azzaroli and Voorhies, 1993;Alberdi et al, 1998;Palombo and Alberdi, 2017;Bernor et al, 2018Bernor et al, , 2019Rook et al, 2019;Cirilli et al, 2020a,b); this hypothesis has also been supported by some recent paleogenomic analyses (Orlando et al, 2013;Vilstrup et al, 2013). Nevertheless, this hypothesis is not shared by some scholars, which prefer to identify the North American species into the genus Plesippus (Matthew, 1924;Gazin, 1936), and the Eurasian and African species into Allohippus (Kretzoi, 1938;Gromova, 1949); in their opinion, the genus Equus should be recognized as younger than 1 Ma (Eisenmann and Baylac, 2000;Eisenmann and Deng, 2005;Barrón-Ortiz et al, 2019). In this work, we consider the North American and Eurasian fossil species as being members of the genus Equus, following Skinner and Hibbard (1972), Azzaroli (1992Azzaroli ( , 2000Azzaroli ( , 2002, Azzaroli and Voorhies (1993), Alberdi et al (1998), Vilstrup et al (2013), Orlando et al (2013), Palombo and Alberdi (2017), Cantalapiedra et al (2017), Bernor et al (2018Bernor et al ( , 2019, Rook et al (2019), and Cirilli et al (2020a,b).…”
Section: Present Background Of the Genus Equus In The Old World Durinmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The generic name Haringtonhippus was recently proposed for the non-caballine horse (Heintzman et al 2017). However, a recent phylogenetic analysis identified Haringtonhippus within the group that includes species traditionally assigned to Equus (Barrón-Ortiz et al 2018). Regardless of how the caballine and non-caballine species are named, several studies consistently identify them as distinct lineages (e.g., Weinstock et al 2005; Barrón-Ortiz et al 2017; Heintzman et al 2017); therefore, their recognition as separate taxonomic units in the present study is well supported.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We preferred not to synonymize Haringtonhippus to Equus, as suggested by Barrón-Ortiz et al (2019), given the profound discrepancies between the genomic and morphologic analyses about the phylogenetic position of H. francisci, which reflect that the definition of Equus is a work still in progress ( Barrón-Ortiz et al, 2019). Future analyses combining morphology and genomics will shed light about the phylogenetic relationships of H. francisci.…”
Section: Studied Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species was reported (as Equus conversidens) from San Josecito Cave, Nuevo Léon, based upon a short mitochondrial DNA sequence (Barrón-Ortiz et al, 2017); this record was subsumed into H. francisci by Heintzman et al (2017). Finally, Barrón-Ortiz et al (2019) based on a morphology-based tree, determined that Equus comprises eight species, including H. francisci, and suggested that Haringtonhippus should be considered a synonym of Equus, but the authors do not formally synonymize both taxa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%