What is Collaborative, Interdisciplinary Reasoning? The Heart of Interdisciplinary Team Research

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: Collaborative, interdisciplinary research is growing rapidly, but we still have limited and fragmented understanding of what is arguably the heart of such research—collaborative, interdisciplinary reasoning (CIR). Background: This article integrates neo-Pragmatist theories of reasoning with insights from literature on interdisciplinary research to develop a working definition of collaborative, interdisciplinary reasoning. The article then applies this definition to an empirical example to demonstrate its utility. Methodology: The empirical example is an excerpt from a Toolbox workshop transcript. The article reconstructs a cogent, inductive, interdisciplinary argument from the excerpt to show how CIR can proceed in an actual team. Contribution: The study contributes operational definitions of ‘reasoning together’ and ‘collaborative, interdisciplinary reasoning’ to existing literature. It also demonstrates empirical methods for operationalizing these definitions, with the argument reconstruction providing a brief case study in how teams reason together. Findings: 1. Collaborative, interdisciplinary reasoning is the attempted integration of disciplinary contributions to exchange, evaluate, and assert claims that enable shared understanding and eventually action in a local context. 2. Pragma-dialectic argument reconstruction with conversation analysis is a method for observing such reasoning from a transcript. 3. The example team developed a strong inductive argument to integrate their disciplinary contributions about modeling. Recommendations for Practitioners: 1. Interdisciplinary work requires agreeing with teammates about what is assertible and why. 2. To assert something together legitimately requires making a cogent, integrated argument. Recommendation for Researchers: 1. An argument is the basic unit of analysis for interdisciplinary integration. 2. To assess the argument’s cogency, it is helpful to reconstruct it using pragma-dialectic principles and conversation analysis tools. 3. To assess the argument’s interdisciplinary integration and participant roles in the integration, it is helpful to graph the flow of words as a Sankey chart from participant-disciplines to the argument conclusion. Future Research: How does this definition of CIR relate to other interdisciplinary ‘cognition’ or ‘learning’ type theories? How can practitioners and theorists tell the difference between true intersubjectivity and superficial agreeableness in these dialogues? What makes an instance of CIR ‘good’ or ‘bad’? How does collaborative, transdisciplinary reasoning differ from CIR, if at all?

Defining the Dialogue between Sciences: A View on Transdisciplinary Perspective in the Human Sciences

“…Transdisciplinarity does not require exhaustive knowledge of all disciplines, but rather its focus lies in understanding how knowledge is created. This theoretical perspective implies a cognitive shift towards the humanization of the human sciences, constituted by collective thinking, team research and interdisciplinary reasoning (Laursen, 2018;Lotrecchiano & Misra, 2018).…”

Evaluating integration in collaborative cross-disciplinary FDA new drug reviews using an input-process-output model

“…The data collected and analyzed using the contextualized O'Rourke et al framework and IPO model also enabled the visual representation of review issue integration for each case using Sankey flow models, similar to an approach used by Laursen [30]. These flow models have been used to describe crossdisciplinary reasoning and offer a unique visual representation of the integration that occurs from inputs to outputs.…”

Music Therapy for Children with Oncology & Hematological Conditions and Their Families: Advancing the Standards of Psychosocial Care

“…Riley's model of care delivery was created using a team-based service development program, grounded in collaborative reasoning (Laursen, 2018; Shoemark et al, 2018). Therapists provide pathways to improve psychological, behavioral, and physiological functioning using music.…”